You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
How CIA Director John Brennan Targeted James Comey
2018-02-13
[Real Clear Politics] Former CIA director John Brennan is having trouble keeping his Trump-Russia stories straight. On Meet the Press this past Sunday, host Chuck Todd asked MSNBC’s new national security analyst about George Papadopoulos, a volunteer adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, and his reputed ties to Russia.

Skipping down para 4 and the British GCHQ role:

Todd asked Brennan if the intelligence on Papadopoulos came "through the C.I.A. via the Five Eyes thing," referring to the intelligence-sharing relationship between the five English-speaking powers, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. Brennan’s response, though, went off-script.

He wasn’t "going to get into details about how it was acquired," he explained. "But the F.B.I. has a very close relationship with its British counterparts. And so the F.B.I. had visibility into a number of things that were going on involving some individuals who may have had some affiliation with the Trump campaign."

British counterparts? The Times report, based on interviews with former and current U.S. and foreign officials, had claimed that the Australians passed on the tip. Did the Times get that part of its story wrong? Perhaps Downer, Australia’s former foreign minister, had told British police who passed it to the FBI. Or maybe Brennan misspoke, or misremembered.

What seems more likely is that the former CIA director told the truth. Informed sources in Washington have been whispering for months that Britain’s intelligence service, the Government Communications Headquarters, the U.K.’s version of America’s National Security Agency, was intercepting the emails and phone calls of Trump officials. "It’s not impossible," a former high-ranking U.S. intelligence officer told me, "that the information came from the Brits. Under certain circumstances, we can search their database, and they can search ours. Our intelligence-sharing relationship with the U.K. is much closer than it is with anyone else, by far the closest we have. But something like that wouldn’t be routine in our relationship."

Luke Harding of the Guardian, apparently one of the few journalists with access to Steele, first reported April 13 that the GCHQ had played a central part in uncovering Trump’s possible ties to Russia, and forwarding the information they had directly on to John Brennan. The next day CNN published a similar report.

Citing U.S. and U.K. intelligence sources, Harding wrote, "GCHQ played an early, prominent role in kickstarting the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, which began in late July 2016." According to one account, reported Harding, "GCHQ’s then-head, Robert Hannigan, passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan. The matter was deemed so sensitive it was handled at ’director level.’ After an initially slow start, Brennan used GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major inter-agency investigation."
Brennan knows the noose is tightening. This is little more than a 'damage control' kabuki dance.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  It wasn't a hack. Seth Rich copied it to a thumb drive. Forensics shows this.

Clapper and Brennan created the Russian hack as a false trail. Looks like they are going after Brennan first.
Posted by: S. Thaick9166   2018-02-13 17:10  

#10  And WikiLeaks did publish a bunch of CIA hacking tools that showed that the CIA could hack a computer and make it look like someone else did it...so why does anyone think it was the Russians that hacked Shillary's email and Podesta's email?
What was there to learn about the inner sleaziness of the Clinton campaign that would interest the Russians? Answer nothing. Real question: Who shot Seth Rich?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2018-02-13 16:23  

#9   Nune's committee targeting Brennan for perjury.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-02-13 14:16  

#8  I'm really not surprised that a bunch of credentialed back slapping oxbridge types (GCHQ) in an opaque bureaucracy manage to continuously churn out such drivel.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2018-02-13 12:39  

#7  A David Kelly refresher.
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-02-13 08:43  

#6  "What seems more likely is that the former CIA director told the truth."

Ya, no.

Or maybe Brennan misspoke lied through his teeth, or misremembered just decided to double down on lying for Obama Inc.
Posted by: Woodrow   2018-02-13 08:13  

#5  In July, David Kelly will have been gone 15 years.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-02-13 06:48  

#4  Besoeker,
That is a safe bet. It's a b*tch when your own team evil is the one who takes you out.
Posted by: C. the Imp.   2018-02-13 06:37  

#3  I'll go one further; I doubt we'll ever hear from or see Christopher Steele again.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-02-13 06:35  

#2  Clapper and Brennan went to CROWDSOURCE to create the fake documents that they used to support the false narrative that it was a Russian hack that took the DNC emails to try and cover for Seth Rich's copying of those same emails directly from the server room.

Since they both knew that Seith Rich was the real source that makes them complicit in his murder. Why else would they try to cover up the evidence?

Phase three in action.
Posted by: C. the Imp.   2018-02-13 06:28  

#1  He (Brennan) wasn’t "going to get into details about how it was acquired," he explained.

Of course he wasn't going to share the details, he was the architect of the "details." He couldn't trust the NSA and Admiral Rogers to go along, so he outsourced the surveillance.

Intelligence sharing at these levels is not conducted in an adhoc, 'oh by the way' manner. It is accomplished through coordinated taskings.

Christopher Steele, a former senior employee of British Airways? No, I believe he worked for someone else. James Comey "targeted"? I doubt it. Helpful accomplice I suspect. They were after all, reporting to the same master.

Posted by: Besoeker   2018-02-13 05:56  

00:00