| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Coast Guard Chief Will Disregard President Trump's Ban on Transgenders in Military |
| 2017-08-04 |
| [Breitbart] The U.S. Coast Guard commandant has announced he will disregard President Donald Trump’s ban on transgenders in the military. Admiral Paul F. Zukunft, who took charge of the Coast Guard under former President Barack Obama, says he "will not break faith" with transgenders under his command. "The first thing we did is we reached out to all 13 members of the Coast Guard who have come out" as transgender, Zukunft said at an event at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, reports the Hill. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #16 Article 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION Does the uCMJ applies to the puddle pirates. |
| Posted by: Injun Bucket8891 2017-08-04 20:25 |
| #15 UCMJ Article 89? |
| Posted by: Injun Bucket8891 2017-08-04 20:19 |
| #14 Coastlines work for DHS, so Mattis is their boss. Whomever Trump picks can expect this jerkoff's insubordinate attitude to be the content of the confirmation hearings. Makes you wonder who called him with guidance and how that might constitute a crime. |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2017-08-04 17:32 |
| #13 Let him disobey. Then toss his ass in Leavenworth for life. |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2017-08-04 17:24 |
| #12 13 Shallow Water Sailors is all it takes for this putz to toss everything away??? if DJT doesn't have Mad Dog sh!tcan him like previous comments say, all 'good order and discipline' is right down the ol' USS Ford Non urinal equipped sh!tters.... |
| Posted by: USN, ret. 2017-08-04 17:08 |
| #11 Yo Paulie, what's your plan once you've left government service? Its not like you can't another Capt Crunch to run the Coast Guard... |
| Posted by: Regular joe 2017-08-04 16:38 |
| #10 Lotsa jobs for ex-admirals? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-08-04 16:10 |
| #9 Whose health care does he plan to cut in order to pay for all the freaks' addadicktome operations? |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2017-08-04 13:03 |
| #8 Yep, but those in the service understand 1) Warning Order and 2) Commanders intent. WOs are just as often verbal as textual, particularly if you are in a fluid environment. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-08-04 11:37 |
| #7 "Ah, the things we do for love!" |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2017-08-04 10:35 |
| #6 Rjschwarz again said it better, darn it! |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2017-08-04 09:42 |
| #5 A presidential tweet is one thing. Only once it is a direct order will this thing change, and not just in the Coast Guard. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2017-08-04 09:41 |
| #4 A tweet is not actual policy. Has he actually implemented the ban as official policy yet? |
| Posted by: Rjschwarz 2017-08-04 09:19 |
| #3 He will do that anyway. Might be the very reason he's doing it. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2017-08-04 09:08 |
| #2 Which would free him to go on every MSM news show for months, pounding the administration. |
| Posted by: Angusock Chuting6110 2017-08-04 09:04 |
| #1 Too easy. Relief for cause, no ceremony, no cake. Have your desk cleaned out by noon on Monday admiral. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2017-08-04 08:50 |