| Submit your comments on this article |
| China-Japan-Koreas |
| The Two Clinton Nuclear Bombs |
| 2016-09-16 |
| The two nuclear bombs dropped on Japan were known as "Little Boy" and "Fat Man." The world today has two new nuclear bombs. One is named "Fat Bill." The other is named "Little Hillary." The "Bill Clinton" bomb is the one getting the most headlines as North Korea continues testing its nuclear weapons. The Communist dictatorship is on its fifth test already and achieved an explosion almost at the level of "Little Boy" which was dropped on Hiroshima. North Korea has let it be known that this test has allowed it to produce standardized nuclear warheads "able to be mounted on strategic ballistic rockets" so that it can "produce at will and as many as it wants a variety of smaller, lighter and diversified nuclear warheads of higher strike power." Kim doesn’t just want a nuke. He wants a lot of nukes. And at the rate he’s going, he will have them. And the man to thank for all that is Bill Clinton. In the fall of ’94, Clinton told the American people that his deal with North Korea would help bring "an end to the threat of nuclear proliferation on the Korean Peninsula. ...Bill Clinton sold America the same bill of goods on North Korea that Obama did on Iran. North Korea would have its isolation eased and "our relationship" with it would develop. He was right about that. Our relationship developed to the point of North Korea threatening us with the nuclear weapons that he promised us it wouldn't have. Bill’s relationship with North Korea developed to the point of a paid speaking gig that was turned down by the ethics office at the State Department. That’s the first Clinton Bomb. It’s named "Fat Bill." North Korea has also supplied nuclear technology to Iran. And that’s the other Clinton Bomb. It’s called "Little Hillary." Hillary Clinton has been very eager to claim credit for the Iran Deal. Indeed her boss’ worthless deal with the nuclear terror state closely echoes her husband’s worthless deal with another nuclear terror state. Even the rhetoric was the same. In Bill’s speech, he claimed that the deal with North Korea "does not rely on trust." In Obama’s speech, he insisted that, "this deal is not built on trust." Except that it did and it does. Iran got to collect its own samples and turn them over to the IAEA. That’s the definition of trust. ...For the Iran Deal to be credible, we have to trust that Iran doesn’t want a nuclear bomb. Hillary initiated the pivot to let Iran continue enriching uranium. As her campaign adviser said, "She recognized the difficulty of reaching a solution with zero enrichment." As with the rest of her politics, Hillary Clinton has held an infinite number of positions on Iran’s nuclear enrichment. But behind closed doors, this was her true position. North Korea’s "Fat Bill" bomb and Iran’s "Little Hillary" bomb are interconnected. The two terror states, one red and the other green, one left-wing and the other Islamic, help each other. Much as Bill helped North Korea and Hillary helped Iran. The world faces the prospect of two terror states armed with nuclear weapons as the legacy for two politicians named Clinton who sold out their country and ushered in a new age of nuclear terror. If a North Korean bomb is used in war, it will be Bill’s bomb. And if Iran uses nuclear weapons, it will be Hillary’s hellish explosion. Stopping the two Clinton bombs may be the biggest national security challenge for a future president. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #3 The liberal way is to do whatever they want today to look good and kick the can down the road. Someone else will pick up the check. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-09-16 14:16 |
| #2 Let's not forget the Raytheon deal to China. That technology surely has been shared with NK and Iran. |
| Posted by: jvalentour 2016-09-16 12:06 |
| #1 Using their nukes to attack anyone costs the norks money. Selling their nukes to terrorists brings in money. You do the math... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2016-09-16 09:03 |