You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
How Elizabeth Holmes house of cards came tumbling down
2016-09-07
I know it's Vanity Fair. Just read it, willya?
It was late morning on Friday, October 18, when Elizabeth Holmes realized that she had no other choice. She finally had to address her employees at Theranos, the blood-testing start-up that she had founded as a 19-year-old Stanford dropout, which was now valued at some $9 billion. Two days earlier, a damning report published in The Wall Street Journal had alleged that the company was, in effect, a sham—that its vaunted core technology was actually faulty and that Theranos administered almost all of its blood tests using competitors’ equipment.

The article created tremors throughout Silicon Valley, where Holmes, the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire, had become a near universally praised figure. Curiosity about the veracity of the Journal story was also bubbling throughout the company’s mustard-and-green Palo Alto headquarters, which was nearing the end of a $6.7 million renovation. Everyone at Theranos, from its scientists to its marketers, wondered what to make of it all.

For two days, according to insiders, Holmes, who is now 32, had refused to address these concerns. Instead, she remained largely holed up in a conference room, surrounded by her inner circle. Half-empty food containers and cups of stale coffee and green juice were strewn on the table as she strategized with a phalanx of trusted advisers, including Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, then Theranos’s president and C.O.O.; Heather King, the company’s general counsel; lawyers from Boies, Schiller & Flexner, the intrepid law firm; and crisis-management consultants. Most of the people in the war room had been there for two days and nights straight, according to an insider, leaving mainly to shower or make a feeble attempt at a couple of hours of shut-eye. There was also an uncomfortable chill in the room. At Theranos, Holmes preferred that the temperature be maintained in the mid-60s, which facilitated her preferred daily uniform of a black turtleneck with a puffy black vest—a homogeneity that she had borrowed from her idol, the late Steve Jobs.

Holmes had learned a lot from Jobs. Like Apple, Theranos was secretive, even internally. Just as Jobs had famously insisted at 1 Infinite Loop, 10 minutes away, that departments were generally siloed, Holmes largely forbade her employees from communicating with one another about what they were working on—a culture that resulted in a rare form of executive omniscience. At Theranos, Holmes was founder, C.E.O., and chairwoman. There wasn’t a decision—from the number of American flags framed in the company’s hallway (they are ubiquitous) to the compensation of each new hire—that didn’t cross her desk.

And like Jobs, crucially, Holmes also paid indefatigable attention to her company’s story, its “narrative.” Theranos was not simply endeavoring to make a product that sold off the shelves and lined investors’ pockets; rather, it was attempting something far more poignant. In interviews, Holmes reiterated that Theranos’s proprietary technology could take a pinprick’s worth of blood, extracted from the tip of a finger, instead of intravenously, and test for hundreds of diseases—a remarkable innovation that was going to save millions of lives and, in a phrase she often repeated, “change the world.” In a technology sector populated by innumerable food-delivery apps, her quixotic ambition was applauded. Holmes adorned the covers of Fortune, Forbes, and Inc., among other publications. She was profiled in The New Yorker and featured on a segment of Charlie Rose. In the process, she amassed a net worth of around $4 billion.
Much more at the link
Posted by:badanov

#10  "History doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2016-09-07 22:29  

#9  It's not clear if was a good idea that simply couldn't be made to work, or a fraud from the beginning. I suspect the latter.
Posted by: phil_b   2016-09-07 19:00  

#8  there is no western justice anymore
Posted by: 746   2016-09-07 17:55  

#7  But she fit the narrative perfectly - and that what counts nowadays.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-09-07 17:36  

#6  No personal protective equipment, for one...
Posted by: Pappy   2016-09-07 17:27  

#5  Holmes is a Fraud, but she gets the pass. Some folks are just not allowed to fail - so when they do, the consequences are suffered by others.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2016-09-07 17:14  

#4  TW, at a guess I would think that a blood testing facility would be, if not sterile, a whole lot cleaner than that looks.

True?
Posted by: AlanC   2016-09-07 14:34  

#3  Go to the article. Scroll down to the photo of the machine she developed. Then scroll down a good deal further to the ohoto of the lab where the testing is claimed to have taken place. Other than a distinct lack of the famed machine, what else do you notice about what is essentially a blood testing factory?
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-09-07 14:09  

#2  I've seen this kinda story, albeit on smaller scale, a dozen times. In fact, Hillary, is this kind of story.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-09-07 01:54  

#1  Paranoia, self destroyer...
Posted by: Raj   2016-09-07 00:18  

00:00