| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| A Clinton Presidency Would Be the Political Equivalent of an Extinction Level Event |
| 2016-08-23 |
| [AmericanThinker] Forget the arrogance and corruption -- $153 million in Clinton family speaking fees from 2001, mainly bribes during her State Department years. Forget the lies, the lies about lies, and the perjury. Forget the security breaches. Forget enabling America’s most prominent sexual predator. Forget the trail of bodies stretching from Little Rock to Benghazi. Forget every scandal from Whitewater to deleted e-mails. Forget all of it. Instead, focus on coming attractions -- what a Clinton presidency would mean for America. It would be the political equivalent of an extinction level event. Obama began the process of transforming America. Hillary will finish it -- and us too. However, if you elect Trump, sophisticated Europeans will make fun of you --- just like they did when you elected Reagan. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #8 Well, it could very well help end the theatrical facade of the old republic and give even the rubes the awareness that its an oligarchy. Maybe they'll quit giving up their sons to die to maintain its power then. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-08-23 19:14 |
| #7 Why would anyone obey the law under a Clinton presidency? Why would anyone want to be in the military or follow Clinton as the commander-In-Chief? It would be a cruel joke. You certainly couldn't believe anything she said. You couldn't trust her to have your back if things went to hell. She wouldn't take the 3:00 a.m. call unless there was some money it for her; she didn't things went to $hit at Benghazi. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2016-08-23 17:32 |
| #6 I love California but the pension crisis will destroy this state and nobody is doing anything about it. It is easy to live the blue model lifestyle when you don't pay your bills. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-08-23 14:15 |
| #5 Think California, which went from reliably red to true blue in a generation. I've been telling you people this for years. It is not the fault of the people who lived here in the 1960's, 1970's or 1980's. But by the 1990's the transformation was complete. I know. I was here watching helplessly as it happened. Coming to a state near you. |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2016-08-23 11:34 |
| #4 Matt the money was the route, but power is the object. Consider, would the Clintons drop the Foundation, cut their Presidential pay in half in return for 16 years on Air Force One? |
| Posted by: Shipman 2016-08-23 09:58 |
| #3 The bad news about Hills is that she can be bought. That's also the good news. (She reminds me exactly of former governor Edwin Edwards, except much uglier.) So the issue boils down to whether the American taxpayer can make larger donations to the Clinton Foundation than the Chinese, Putin, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Mad Mullahs, etc. |
| Posted by: Matt 2016-08-23 09:15 |
| #2 Looks to me like both Clinton AND Trump are subjects of Putin. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2016-08-23 08:57 |
| #1 Clinton will maintain the pretense of fighting ISIS while importing the poison. She’s called for increasing the number of Syrian refugees by 500% -- that’s on top of the 100,000 immigrants from the Middle East (overwhelmingly Muslim) admitted each year. The FBI and Homeland Security will be told not to do or say anything that might offend the jihad community. The signals aren’t even subtle -- Huma Abedin with her family’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia advocate Khizr Kahn baiting Trump at the Democratic National Convention, and (in a Rod Serling-esque moment) the father of Orlando mass murderer Omar Mateen seated behind the candidate at a Florida rally, telling an interviewer Hillary is “good for America” -- i.e., good for the coming Caliphate. All according to the plan. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2016-08-23 07:19 |