You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Champ's last act is to force suburbs to be less white and less wealthy
2016-05-08
[NYP] Hillary's rumored running mate, Housing Secretary Julian Castro, is cooking up a scheme to reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.
Because eliminating 'white' and 'wealthy' from urban America has had such splendid results.
The scheme involves super-sizing vouchers to help urban poor afford higher rents in pricey areas, such as Westchester County, while assigning them government real-estate agents called "mobility counselors" to secure housing in the exurbs.

Castro plans to launch the Section 8 reboot this fall, even though a similar program tested a few years ago in Dallas has been blamed for shifting violent crime to affluent neighborhoods.

It’s all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs.

Anticipating NIMBY resistance, Castro last month threatened to sue suburban landlords for discrimination if they refuse even Section 8 tenants with criminal records. And last year, he implemented a powerful new regulation -- "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing" -- that pressures all suburban counties taking federal grant money to change local zoning laws to build more low-income housing (landlords of such properties are required to accept Section 8 vouchers).

Castro is expected to finalize the new regulation, known as "Small-Area Fair Market Rents" (SAFMR), this October, in the last days of the Obama presidency.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  What Dale said.
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-05-08 21:32  

#4  It will fail. The people will not want to leave their hood. The people of the hood will say,"what are you better than us". With the destruction of the family who will these people be, felons, immigrants?. Once there what transportation will be provided. They will not be working so how will their situation improve. This liberal dream is very old. Individuals have tried this before and it fails. They will not fit in. They will not become a part of the community. It can only work if others pay for everything. The basic reason for failure is no family units. Just multi people units. So you go off to work. Crime goes way up because you didn't earn that. They bring their beliefs not integration. We had a liberal try this. Constantly causing one problem after an another. Never satisfied, never happy. Raw sewage dumped in their yard for recycling. Low income apartments, it all failed.
Posted by: Dale   2016-05-08 14:15  

#3  Considering how many hipster enclaves, college towns, and RINO strongholds could be affected by this, it may be a grotesquely good thing in the end.

Pain can be the best teacher.
Posted by: charger   2016-05-08 12:40  

#2  Let's start with San Francisco first.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-05-08 11:59  

#1  Please excuse me for a moment whilst I quietly ponder the phrase 'last act.'
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-05-08 11:32  

00:00