You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records
2016-01-20
An Obama appointed
federal judge has rejected President Barack Obama's assertion of executive privilege to deny Congress access to records pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, a gunrunning probe that allegedly allowed thousands of weapons to flow across the border into Mexico.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled Tuesday that the Justice Department's public disclosures about its response to the so-called "gun walking" controversy undercut Obama's executive privilege claim.

"There is no need to balance the need against the impact that the revelation of any record could have on candor in future executive decision making, since any harm that might flow from the public revelation of the deliberations at issue here has already been self-inflicted," Jackson wrote. "The Department itself has already publicly revealed the sum and substance of the very material it is now seeking to withhold. Since any harm that would flow from the disclosures sought here would be merely incremental, the records must be produced."

Jackson said she wasn't questioning the propriety of Obama's claim of privilege, but ruling that the claim could not be sustained in view of other information the Justice Department had released on the topic, chiefly an Office of Inspector General report released in September 2012.

"This ruling is not predicated on a finding that the withholding was intended to cloak wrongdoing on the part of government officials or that the withholding itself was improper," the judge wrote.
No, no, hurruph. Of course not
The administration could appeal the ruling. Spokescriters at the Justice Department and the White House didn't immediately respond
I guess flicking the bird is not considered a response.
to requests for comment.
Posted by:Sven the pelter

#5  Whoops, that was supposed to go under the Attkisson's Benghazi links article.

But it almost applies here, too. Minus the quote, of course.
Posted by: gorb   2016-01-20 22:51  

#4  At the end of part two, the video offers this quote from the State Department: "The notion that [it] did not do everything possible to protect our people that night is as offensive as it is wrong."

That is about as wrong as it can get, and by their own words, that makes it just as offensive. A whole bunch of folks need to go to jail for murder and accessory to murder.
Posted by: gorb   2016-01-20 22:50  

#3  Then there is this.
Posted by: Sven the pelter   2016-01-20 12:51  

#2  To paraphrase Andrew Jackson, "Judge Jackson has made her decision. Now let us see her enforce it."

I predict that Obama will simply ignore the order.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2016-01-20 11:04  

#1  "This ruling is not predicated on a finding that the withholding was intended to cloak wrongdoing on the part of government officials or that the withholding itself was improper," the judge wrote.

Oh but of course not. Who would ever attempt to attribute regime 'wrong doing' to 'cloaking' or a cover up.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-01-20 00:45  

00:00