You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Obama admin concedes: Mideast peace is beyond reach on his watch
2015-11-08
President Obama has concluded that a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians is beyond reach during his presidency and will press Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to take steps to preserve the mere possibility of a two-state solution, senior administration officials said Thursday.

The issue has taken on greater importance with the recent wave of stabbings carried out by Palestinians against Israelis, senior administration members said during a conference call with reporters about Netanyahu’s visit next week. They said that the administration has become “realistic” that there might not even be negotiations between Israeli and Palestinian officials before Obama leaves office.

Rob Malley, the National Security Council’s senior director for the Middle East, said that for the first time in two decades, an American administration “faces the reality” that a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “is not in the cards for the remainder” of a presidency. That, he said, has “led to a reassessment not only of what we can do but of what the parties can do.”

Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser, said, “From the prime minister, we’ll want to hear what his views are for how the Israeli government can take steps” to build confidence and “to make clear that there is an aspiration” for a two-state solution, which Rhodes said was the only way forward. What those steps might be wasn’t clear, though Rhodes and Malley said that the expansion of West Bank settlements remained an issue. Malley said the president would ask “how does the prime minister see things going forward” and hear his ideas of “what can be done in the absence of negotiations.”

Sources close to the U.S. and Israeli governments, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect their relationships, said that Secretary of State John F. Kerry is particularly worried about the expansion of settlements and the possibility of what one source called “creeping annexation.” Middle East experts said other steps might include measures to improve economic conditions and ease movement through checkpoints.

The tension between Israel and the Palestinian Authority will be just one of the items on the agenda when Obama and Netanyahu meet. They will also discuss the next 10-year memorandum of understanding on military cooperation between the United States and Israel; the chaotic situation in Syria; how to counter Iranian threats to Israel, either from Syria or through Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza; and the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal that Obama championed and Netanyahu ardently opposed.

“Nothing can be done to cover up that we had a policy disagreement,” Rhodes said, referring to the Iran deal. But, he said, the United States would continue to look for ways to bolster already close military and intelligence cooperation to ensure Israel’s security.
Posted by:Pappy

#14  It was Gremlins, I say, or was it KREMLINS???

* RELATED TELEGRAPH.UK > WHITE HOUSE GIVES UP ON ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN TWO-STATE SOLUTION PEACE DEAL, as occurring before the Bamm formally leaves office in Jan. 2017.

* WAFF > YEMENI REBELS INVADE SAUDI ARABIAN TOWN + PUT POPULATION TO THE SWORD.

Also repor sank a FOURTH SAUDI NAVY VESSSEL/GUNBOAT.

* MANILA BULLETIN > RUSSIA, CHINA THREATEN GLOBAL ORDER, SAYS US DEFENCE CHIEF [SecDef Ashton Carter]

RELATED ZERO HEDGE > US DEFENCE SECRETARY SUGGESTS PUTIN MIGHT NUKE AMERICA, SAYS US WILL "DEFEND INTERNATIONAL ORDER".

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > [Xinhuanet] INTERVIEW: US MANEUVER IN SOUTH CHINA SEA WASTES MONEY, HARMS MUTUAL TRUST.

US Constitutional Lawyer Bruce Fein, whom also argues that the LAST THING THE US NEEDS IS TO SEE ANOTHER FAILED "MIDDLE EAST" POLICIES SCENARIO PLAY OUT AGAIN IN ASIA OR EAST ASIA, espec vee CHINA.

What do they think is gonna happen - GUAM = PEARL HARBOR BB USS "OKLAHOMA" WILL CAPSIZE DUE TO AMERIKAN BOMBS-N-TORPEDOES [Mil Super-techs]???

["PEARL HARBOR" = Sexy Slinky Pre-OWG Amerika
was Young, Dumb, + Communist but just didn't know it until we caused WW2 by not trading wid Fascist Japan [China?] + attacking our own NB at Pearl Harbor [NYC = 9-11?]].

Yuuup.

You Betcha!

Clear as Day!

"WAYNE'S WORLD" THUMBS UP!

VERSUS

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > "US THREATENS WORLD ORDER, NOT RUSSIA":ANALYST.

Again, the US = Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS Bammer Admin is the proverbial Tip-of-The-Spear in setting up ANTI-US OWG-NWO INCLUDING SSSHHH...CCCC US-WORLD MARXIST-SOCIALIST ORDER.

BUT THE US + ANTI-US US GLOBALISTS DO SO WIDOUT LETTING AMERIKA BEING SEEN AS SO "WEAK/DECLING" SUCH THAT IT BECOMES EXISTENTIALLY THREATENED OR DESTROYED BY GEOPOL RIVALS + WANNABES, E.G. NGOS = NUKE CALIPHATE-HAPPY ISIS + AL-NUSRA/QAEDA BOYZ, OR THE VERY SAME RUSSIAN, CHINESE, + IRANIAN, ETAL? OWG CO-SUPERPOWERS IT HELPED TO CREATE IN THE NAME OF MIGHTY OWG-NWO = SPACE GOVT-ORDER + US-GLOBAL SOCIALISM THAT NO AMERICAN = AMERIKAN HAS BEEN ASKED TO VOTE ON, NOR E-V-A-R!WILL BE IFF THE OWG GLOBIES + ALIGNED HAVE THEIR WAY???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-11-08 23:46  

#13  No WAY! it was you?
Posted by: Frank G   2015-11-08 21:23  

#12  Sorry, above post #11 is mine.

[HISTORY CHANNEL GUY = "I DON'T WANT TO SAY IT WAS GREMLINS, BUT IT WAS GREMLINS"! here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-11-08 20:54  

#11  How can it be wid rivals KSA + Turkey vying for Pan-Muslim leadership in the ME, + Putin/Vladvedev-led Russia + Russia's "SPhere of Influence" now active or crossing widin Iran's "Sphere of Influence"???

AFAIC the Bammer is just PCcorrectly admitting that He's leaving the very same Anarchies-N-Chaoses he hinself + Anti-US OWG Globies did much to cause "as is" for his POTUS Successor(s) to clean up or even to WORSEN - IFF THE BAMMER'S POST-JAN 2017 SUCCESSOR IS INDEED ANOTHER ANTI-US GLOBALIST, IT WILL BE THE LATTER. I.E. THINGS WILL GET MUCH WORSE THAN E-V-A-R! FOR AMERIKA + AMERIKAN INTERESTS.

As a reminder, IMO China's agressiveness in the SCS marks the beginning of its efforts to achieve pro-PLA "strategic access" ASAP AMAP AFAP ALAP through the ENTIRE SO-CALLED "FIRST ISLAND CHAIN" INTO WESTPAC + FAR PACIFIC, TO INCLUDE THE PEACEFUL OR FORCED RECOVERY OF TAIWAN, BY 2020 NLT 2025.

CHINA = PUTIN-LED RUSSIA = IRAN, OTHER? = ARE EITHER DE FACTO OWG CO-SUPERPOWERS LEADING OR DOMINATING THE GLOBAL FEDERAL UNION(S) IN THEIR RESPECTIVE REGIONS, OR THEY ARE NOT = IFF YES, THEY REQUIRE OR NEED OTH = OVERSEAS "SOLE","SPHERE(S) OF INFLUENCE" BEFITTING SUCH = POTUS OBAMA'S JOB AS AN ANTI-US US GLOBALIST IS MAKE SURE THEY ACHIEVE SO, OR IN ALTERNATE ARE ON THE IRREVOCABLE PATH/TRACK TO SAME.

Until such time that OWG-NWO is PERMAMENTLY + IRREVOCABLY GLOBALLY SET UP + ENTRENCNED, Amerika = OWG NOT-America are far from being done vee the ME, Iran, Russia, andor China, ETC. TO COME.

DON'T FEAR ANTI-US OWG GLOBALIST POTUS OBAMA - FEAR MORE HIS OR ANY ANTI-US US OWG GLOBALIST POTUS SUCCESSOR(S).

Not all the above are DemoLefties.
Posted by:    2015-11-08 20:51  

#10  Yeah I read it as lube and didn't even blink.

Lots of articles reading like shots across Israel's bow.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2015-11-08 18:02  

#9  Well, he's made such a hash of things over there with his Iranian advisors that of course peace is beyond his reach.

Wasn't that the plan in the first place???
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2015-11-08 15:40  

#8  Mideast peace is beyond reach on his watch

Beyond his understanding, too.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2015-11-08 15:08  

#7  Butthurt because no "Twofer" from the Nobel academy?
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2015-11-08 12:09  

#6  Actuallly, USN,ret, "lub" sounds strangely appropriate.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-11-08 11:07  

#5  lub > club
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2015-11-08 10:28  

#4  Everything except a golf lub is behond the reach of this tool
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2015-11-08 10:27  

#3  "In consultation with our new Iranian allies, we have decided that this is unnecessary."?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-11-08 10:21  

#2  If Peace is NOT the answer and in my opinion ( which IS an opinion) is that Peace never was and NEVER will be the answer in the Middle East. The thing to do is ADMIT that Peace won't ever be the answer. And then decide who we want to WIN and who we prefer to LOSE. And then decide to really go in HARD to back our choice for who wins. Then shake hands with Putin and get him on board for who gets to keep the can of worms part what when we both chop up Syria and then work to eviscerate Moslems in general right across the spectrum. Don't ""occupy" any of the ruins. Just make it one big smoking hole and stack the garbage.
In a war somebody LOSES. Leave Islam to smoke garbage. Get them to kill each other ( which shouldn't be so hard, they love to do it and it makes them happy).
Emphasize and accelerate and get Moslems to do the heavy lifting parts. Play Moslems off on each other. They should find it very much in keeping with their own tastes. Make sure Islam loses/ poke them with a stick to go at one another. They will, its their nature. Move in here and there and finish off the wounded. Divide it up with Putin, share the gravy after robbing the cripples.
There might even be some money in it. Bravo Sykes-Picot/
Posted by: Nero Smiter of the Leprechauns4652   2015-11-08 09:06  

#1  Perhaps he can make it work in the third or fourth term of his reign after he eliminates the 22nd amendment by executive order.
Posted by: Skidmark   2015-11-08 02:50  

00:00