You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
The Champ is using anti-Jewish language to sell the Iran deal.
2015-08-01
[Breitbart] Some critics made that claim a week ago, when Obama complained about "the money" and "the lobbyists" on the other side of the debate over the Iran nuclear deal. This week, Obama proved it.

On Thursday, Obama led a conference call with left-wing activists in which he repeatedly railed against his political opponents by using the old canard of rich Jews using their money to exert control.

Accusing critics of the deal of being "opposed to any deal with Iran"--i.e. of advocating war--Obama railed against "well-financed" lobbyists, as well as the "big check writers to political campaigns," and "billionaires who happily finance super-PACs." He complained about "$20 million" being spent on ads against the deal--a subtle reference to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC--whose support he had repeatedly courted when running for office).

Some of Obama's references were thinly-veiled attacks on specific (Jewish) individuals--columnist Bill Kristol, for example, the Weekly Standard publisher and former New York Times resident conservative who served in the George H.W. Bush administration, and also helps run the Emergency Committee for Israel, which opposes the Iran deal; or billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who is a prodigious Republican benefactor, super PAC donor, and well-known hawk on Israel issues.

On the call, Obama twice accused his opponents of being the same people "responsible for us getting into the Iraq war." That sweeping, and largely false, characterization of the opponents of the Iran deal repeats the sensational accusations of The Israel Lobby, a widely discredited 2007 book that accused a group of pro-Israel, and largely Jewish, individuals and organizations of pushing the U.S. into war with Iraq, and seeking to drag America into a new war with Iran.

Obama's deliberate, and jarring, choice of words clearly worried even some sympathetic Jews.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  Actually the people pushing the Iraq war in the beginning were the Democrats. The New York Times was strong for it, and the Clintons and lefties were all for it. They voted for it. Recall that Bill Clinton tried to distract from his sex scandal by bombing Iraq. The Republicans objected to that.
My impression is the at the time the Dems wanted to pose as the pro-war party thinking that Bush would not go along with getting involved.
If anyone pushed the Iraq war it was Obama's current friends, including Iran.
Posted by: Grins Snese4215   2015-08-01 18:20  

#4  On the call, Obama twice accused his opponents of being the same people "responsible for us getting into the Iraq war."

That would be the "neocons," which also translates in left-speak to "jews."
Posted by: Pappy   2015-08-01 15:26  

#3  Not really blatantly, flagrantly antisemitic language. Are they saying he's using some kind of code that he got from that book so that when he says "big check writers" and "billionaires" he really means Jews?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-08-01 14:05  

#2  I'm surprised it took him so long---maybe he's not joking about the third term.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-08-01 13:07  

#1  Antisemitism has a constituency. Just that any decent person would avoid it, not court it.

Champ - not just a bad president, he's a bad person too.
Posted by: Iblis   2015-08-01 13:03  

00:00