You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Senators Rally Conservative Support for $2 Trillion Carbon Fee Bill
2015-06-19
Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) have proposed a bill that would establish an economy-wide tax on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions.
Oh joy!
"My bill sets the fee for a ton of carbon at $45 in 2016, the central range of the social cost of carbon as estimated by OMB, and would increase it each year at a real 2 percent. When emissions fall 80 percent below 2005 levels, the annual adjustment would fall to inflation," Whitehouse said at the American Enterprise Institute when presenting the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act.

Whitehouse, who makes regular speeches on the Senate floor warning about climate change, said the nonpartisan group Resources for the Future has concluded the carbon fee would reduce U.S. CO2 emissions 40 percent by 2025. He explained it is difficult to estimate the impact of the bill internationally. Despite this, Whitehouse told the audience the U.S. should take the lead by reducing emissions.
Despite whatever we do is worthless compared to other countries telling Al Gore to fuck off, we will do anyway because.... Climate Change. And money. For us. Not you.
"This carbon fee would generate over $2 trillion in revenue over 10 years. It is intended to return every dollar of that to the American people," he said.
Minus the 50% graft shipping and handling fee of course
The bill reduces the top marginal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 29 percent and provides workers with a $500 refundable tax credit or $1,000 per couple to offset the first $500 paid in Social Security payroll taxes. Whitehouse said the credit would grow with inflation.
There is the sweetener for "conservatives". Because BUSINESS!!!
Whitehouse and Schatz encouraged conservatives to support the legislation.

"It would cut back on the pollution that threatens dramatic changes to our home planet, it would cut taxes, it would end a market distortion, it would start a wave of investment and innovation," Whitehouse said.
And get us more bribes!
"With this bill I extend an open hand, or as one colleague said, an olive limb, to conservatives everywhere. Whether you want to pursue tax reform, support the free market for energy, or as Lindsay Graham suggested this week, accept the effects of climate change, I'm looking forward to working with you."

Schatz called the bill a "market-based" proposal for reducing carbon pollution. He said British Columbia was able to reduce petroleum consumption more the rest of Canada without negative impacts on economic growth.
They must be using that government math again
"Some do worry that going it alone on carbon pricing may present some challenges for the American economy but another successful market-based approach in British Columbia shows that you can make an impact without harming the economy, even when jurisdictions around you are not pricing carbon," he said.
Bullshit then, bullshit now and bullshit forever.
Posted by:DarthVader

#9  Why can't I just plant some trees to absorb my CO2 emissions instead?
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-06-19 19:14  

#8  I think if conservatives trusted govt to do what it says it does, they would support a smaller $/ton version given that it is revenue neutral.

By the way, the average car emits about 4-6 tons of CO2 per year so $45/ton. So I think the tax break part of he Whitehouse bill is over stated compared to the tax portion (what a surprise).
Posted by: lord garth   2015-06-19 17:24  

#7  OF course all this carbon tax and spend won't dent any upcoming climate change one little degree.

But ten - that isn't the intention is it?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-06-19 17:06  

#6  
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-06-19 15:13  

#5  And when the worldwide temperature starts to drop so much that it can no longer be hidden, will they drop the carbon tax?

I didn't think so.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2015-06-19 13:38  

#4  Given the taxes this would generate, do you think we would actually switch over to anything other than carbon-free sources anytime soon?
Posted by: gorb   2015-06-19 12:31  

#3  "This carbon fee would generate over $2 trillion in revenue over 10 years. It is intended to return every dollar of that to the American people," he said.

Another tax passthru to consumers from the carbon generators.
Posted by: Skidmark   2015-06-19 12:13  

#2  I want to see the list of exemptions.
Posted by: Matt   2015-06-19 09:43  

#1  Really folks, this article is likely a "leak" of one of the Obamatrade provisions. Close your eyes and vote for the transition to world wide socialism. Hell meet hand basket.
Posted by: One Eyed Greang8751   2015-06-19 08:29  

00:00