You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Unions Pour Millions into Clinton Foundation
2015-05-19
Quidding that for the pro quo? *shudder* Let's hope her opponent wins as big as Scott Walker has done.
[FREEBEACON] Big labor funneled millions of dollars in dues money to the Clinton Foundation, according to a new report.

The National Institute for Labor Relations Research (NILRR), a union watchdog group, traced at least $2 million in donations from multiple union organizations and affiliates.

"U.S. Department of Labor's union financial disclosure reports reveal that Big Labor gave at least $2,034,500 in union general treasury funds to Clinton Foundations. Union treasuries are funded mostly by compulsory union dues or fees collected from workers who would be fired for refusing to pay," the NILRR report says. "As Mrs. Clinton became closer to her current run for president, donations amounts appear to have increased."

The Clintons have turned their foundation into a lucrative "slush fund," according to one charity watchdog group, and have received hundreds of millions of dollars from notable businesses, media personalities, and political luminaries. The family has maintained that none of those donations influenced her decisions as secretary of state and that the money is strictly philanthropic.

However,
there's more than one way to skin a cat...
unions did not necessarily agree about the apolitical nature of the donations, according to NILRR.

"Some of these 'donations' are categorized by the unions as 'political' on their financial disclosure report" to the Labor Department, the report says.
Posted by:Fred

#6  IIRC as per LUCIANNE, BIG LABOR sezzes that only 1/4 of the World's workers have "good-paying" jobs.

Hillary had better be careful lest she lest she ends up being "JFK'ed" - US LABOR IS ALREADY MIGHTILY UPSET WID THE BAMMER DUE TO HIS ADMIN + WASHINGTON ALLOWING MILYUHNS-N-DILYUHNS OF FOREIGN MIGRANTS-WORKERS EASY ACCESS TO DOMESTIC US JOPS, BUT ITS NOT RECIPROCATED OVERSEAS BY ALLIED OR PARTNERED FOREIGN GOVTS VEE GRANTING DOMESTIC ACCESS TO US WORKERS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-05-19 23:19  

#5  as Obama has shown, do a suitable bootlicking effort and there just...might..be a spokeshole position or "advisor" position available in the next Regime
Posted by: Frank G   2015-05-19 14:49  

#4  #3 I think this explains why the media has been trumping Hillary as the heir apparent.

She's got the dough. The MSM follows the money, democrat money that is.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-05-19 13:28  

#3  I think this explains why the media has been trumping Hillary as the heir apparent.

Might be on their own initiative as well. I have a hard time believing ABC's George Stephanopolous is the only Clinton Foundation contributor in the media.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-05-19 13:24  

#2  Scott Walker upended the Union system in his state. Can that be repeated on a national level?

I think this explains why the media has been trumping Hillary as the heir apparent. They know she has the foot soldiers and solid financial backing of the unions. Progressive coalition falls apart into squabbly children without the unions.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-05-19 10:20  

#1  Somehow this cozy relationship with unions, Progressive causes and politics has to end. If you belong to a union, your dues get collected by your work organization for the unions. Whether you agree with the Progressive cause or not, your dues go to support the Progressive cause. In a sense, through your dues you end up voting for the Progressive cause even though you might hate what they stand for. Your job is contingent upon belonging to the union in non-right-to-work states. This is bald faced coercion or shakedown--not much different than buying Mafia protection.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-05-19 08:18  

00:00