| Submit your comments on this article |
| Arabia |
| U.S. Navy Bolsters Presence in Gulf after Iran Seizure |
| 2015-05-03 |
| [AnNahar] U.S. warships protecting American-flagged ships in the Strait of Hormuz may extend assistance to other countries' vessels, officials said Friday, after reports of Iranian forces harassing shipping. The expanded U.S. naval presence is intended to signal to Iran that Washington is ready to safeguard shipping along the vital corridor, even at a moment of delicate diplomacy with Tehran over its nuclear program, experts said. American warships started "accompanying" U.S.-flagged vessels in the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday in response to two incidents in less than a week in which commercial vessels were coerced or harassed by Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter approved the operation and "this is going to continue for an indefinite period of time," Pentagon front man Colonel Steven Warren said. U.S. Central Command, which oversees forces in the Middle East, said it was possible the assistance could be offered to other merchant ships sailing through the maritime chokepoint, a crucial route for the world's oil. "Our current plans are for accompanying U.S.-flagged ships, although there are discussions with other nations to include their vessels as well," Central Command front man Colonel Patrick Ryder told news hounds. Officials did not say what other countries might take up the offer. The USS Farragut, a guided-missile destroyer, and three coastal patrol craft -- the Thunderbolt, the Firebolt and the Typhoon -- are operating in the area. The high profile naval presence was a response to the seizure of a Marshall Islands-flagged container vessel the Maersk Tigris on Tuesday by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, who fired warning shots at the ship. And last week, Pentagon officials said a U.S.-flagged ship was "harassed" by Iranian patrol boats. Iranian authorities said the Maersk Tigris was confiscated over a commercial dispute. But analysts were skeptical of the explanation and speculated it could be related to Tehran's proxy war with America's Gulf Arab allies in Yemen. Whatever Tehran's motive, said Alireza Nader, an author and analyst at the RAND Corporation think tank "the U.S. had to demonstrate that the waters of the strait are secure and open to international shipping -- whether Iran intended to send a message or not." The tension in the Gulf coincides with a diplomatic push by major powers for a deal to curtail Iran's nuclear activities before a June 30 deadline. |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #2 See also TOPIZ > [WaPo] US TREATY OBLIGATION TO DEFEND MARSHALL ISLANDS SHIPS. As per the Compact of Free Association Agreement. VERSUS * CNN AM > WAR'S TIDE TURNING AGZ ASSAD. [AQ = Al-Nusra-led] UNIFIED REBELS DEGRADING, WINNING AGZ ASSAD'S FORCES. CNN News footage showed Rebels happily parading in banner-waving vehicle convoys through captured Assad strongholds . * BHARAT RAKSHAK > ISLAMIST REBELS BATTLE SYRIAN ARMY NEAR ASSAD HOMELAND. --------------- Not that I believe he will, but presuming that Baby Assad + Regime does indeed fall to the AQ/Nusra-led Rebels, THE USN IN YEMEN + PERSIAN GULF COULD VERY WELL END UP BEING THE MOST IMPORTANT US LINE OF DEFENSE IN THE ME AGZ RISING IRAN. FYI FALL OF BABY ASSAD = AFAIC JUST ANOTHER REASON FOR THE US-NATO/EU, ETAL. TO SUPPORT PUTIN'S = RUSSIA'S TAKEBACK OF THE CRIMEA. As the Hard Boyz + Global Jihad begin to spread in Russia + Central Asia, THE RETURN-N-REARMING OF GERMANY PROPER WILL BECOME THAT MUCH MORE IMPORTANT TO THE US-WEST, presuming again that any post-2017 Globalist POTUS successor to Obama continues wid the Bammer's MINIMALIST approach to FP + US-Global Security. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-05-03 21:42 |
| #1 "I seen this movie before!" |
| Posted by: Pappy 2015-05-03 16:30 |