You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
US Defense Commitment to Japan 'Ironclad', Includes Senkakus: Kerry
2015-04-28
[ALMANAR.LB] The US commitment to the defense of Japan is "ironclad," top US diplomat John Kerry vowed Monday as the two allies broadened their military cooperation revising their rules for the first time since 1997.

And amid tensions with China in the South and East China Seas, Kerry said the US commitment "covered all territories" administered by Japan "including the Senkaku islands."
Posted by:Fred

#6  Iff the Kennedy Clan hope to see their family return to prestigious Pol Preeminence, then such hope may indeed rest on Caroline's shoulders vee preventing a major China-Japan = China-US? war, espec Nuclear, in NE Asia.

* By the Precepts or Tenets of ANTI-US OWG GLOBALISM, CHINA is the more correct one in desiring 1/2 of the Pacific [East Asia-WESTPAC] + wanting the US to unilaterally pull back towards Hawaii + US West Coast [EASTPAC], NOT THE US IN ENTRENCHING OR REMAINING, ETC. IN EAST ASIA, WESTPAC, ETC. VEE ITS TRADITIONAL COLD WAR ASIAN ALLIES + POTUS OBAMA'S "PIVOT".

Again, China sees US MilBases everywhere just off its coasts - China sees no PLA Milbases off any US coasts.

Recipe for Geopol + Nukulaar troubles.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-28 23:07  

#5  See also BLOOMBERG > WILL US LET JAPAN LOOSEN ITS [post-WW2/1945] CONSTITUTION?

VERSUS

* WORLD NEWS > [Stars-N-Stripes] REPORT: US, PHILIPPINES AGREE ON [Troops, Air, Naval] ROTATIONS TO [Philippine] BASES NEAR SOUTH CHINA SEA.

Iff China never felt being squeezed by POTUS Obama's "Pivot to Asia", its prob FEELING THE SQUEEZE NOW???

* SAME > [Noodls = Heritage Foundation] AMERICA NEEDS A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY FOR COUNTERING CHINA'S EXPANDING PERIMETER OF NATIONAL INTERESTS.

D *** NG IT, DO YA MEAN CHINA'S DESIRED FUTURE ANTI-US "SPHERE OF INTEREST" IN EAST ASIA-PACIFIC [EastPac] = 1/2 OF THE PACIFIC BOOKER!?

Uh, uh, methinks that Anti-US US OWG Globalist Obama = USA already has strategy - its called PCorrect-Deniable, OWG GLOBALIST US STRATEGIC/GLOBAL SELF-RETREAT = UNILATERAL RETREAT/FALLBACK = US-N-ONLY-THE-US "RETREAT IS WORLD PEACE".

Again, the Globies have NOT yet answered how much is "too much", andor how far is "too far", etc. for the Soon-to-be-Ex-Sole-Superpower-Future C-SUperpower USoAmerika, the OWG Mighty USSA versus the OWG Weak USRoA Gobal SSR, is supposed to give up and retreat widout being existentially threatened by its new Co-Superpower Siblings Russia, Iran, + China, Other(s)? or NGOS, etc. wannabes???

just sayin.

* SAME > [Noodls] YEMEN, IRAN STRATEGIC NAVAL EXPANSION, ANTI-ACCESS AREA -DENIAL [A2-AD].

A [Self = Unilaterally]"Weak/Declining" USA = Rising Iran = Rising China = Rising Putinist Russia = Rising ... ...???

"US-STYLE", NUCLEAR, PAR-WID-THE-USA-NOT-INFERIOR-TO-THE-USA CO-SUPERPOWERS-IN-DA-HOOD.

As one Nation falls, forcibly or voluntarily, Another or Other(s) will rise, correct???

Thus it is NOT wrong to link or infer so-called MilPol/Geopol "Parity" or "Rough Parity" wid some forms(s) of "Superiority" or even
"Dominance".

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > CHINA TO INTEGRATE MONGOLIAN, RUSSIA INITIATIVES WID [India-led] MSR - THE HINDU.

IMO "Russia" in China's view read = EAST OF THE URALS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-04-28 22:54  

#4  Says Jawn, knowing full well Obean won't be put to the test here.
Posted by: gorb   2015-04-28 10:22  

#3  Joe Isuzu couldn't hold a candle to Kerry.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-04-28 09:43  

#2  Well, at least you can't say he isn't covering his Acheson bases on this one. Lip service is the absolute minimum, but wars have started for less.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2015-04-28 09:03  

#1  I'm sure they're reassured. I would be reassured.
(I would start assembling my nukes today.)
Posted by: ed in texas   2015-04-28 07:41  

00:00