You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Government
Emails May Be a Key to Addressing 'Pay-to-Play' Whispers at Clinton Foundation
2015-03-10
[National Journal] "Follow the money." That apocryphal phrase, attributed to Watergate whistle-blower "Deep Throat," explains why the biggest threat to Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential dreams is not her emails. It's her family foundation. That's where the money is: corporate money, foreign money, gobs of money sloshing around a vanity charity that could be renamed "Clinton Conflicts of Interest Foundation."
We certainly know she's not concerned about sex, so that only leaves....money.
What about the emails? Hillary Clinton's secret communications cache is a bombshell deserving of full disclosure because of her assault on government transparency and electronic security. But its greatest relevancy is what the emails might reveal about any nexus between Clinton's work at State and donations to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation from U.S. corporations and foreign nations.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  so she's lying again

Lips moving?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-03-10 16:44  

#10  she had two devices, so she's lying again

Posted by: Frank G   2015-03-10 16:08  

#9  Small wonder Putin is doing so well to set all this current stuff up - he probably had full access to State Dept plans, which have overridden out military's plans repeatedly under Obama.
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-03-10 16:05  

#8  She said she used the server set up during her husband's administration (1993-2001). Bill Clinton's statement on the use of email in 2011 at a conference was:
“I sent a grand total of two emails as president, one to our troops in the Adriatic, and one to John Glenn when he was 77 years old in outer space. I figured it was OK if Congress subpoenaed those.”

You have to wonder how technically up-to-date and secure the server was since it was of 15-20 year vintage.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-03-10 15:37  

#7  Hillary is speaking now about her emails. Her lips are moving--She's lying!
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-03-10 15:22  

#6  Given that any foreign intelligence service worth its salt
Which would certainly include Israel - I wonder what they get and from whom for keeping it secret?
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-03-10 11:31  

#5  According to Judicial Watch:

The State Department lawfully must provide these documents, or a justification for withholding them, to Judicial Watch within 20 working days, or be subject to federal lawsuits under FOIA.

These six new FOIA requests are in addition to requests filed last week directly seeking Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

There are 18 lawsuits, ten of which are active in federal court, as well as about 160 Judicial Watch FOIA requests that could be affected by Mrs. Clinton and her staff’s use of secret email accounts to conduct official government business. In Judicial Watch’s various FOIA lawsuits, lawyers for Judicial Watch have informed attorneys for the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton’s and any other secret accounts used by State employees should be secured, recovered, and searched. Judicial Watch.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-03-10 10:31  

#4  Given that any foreign intelligence service worth its salt has probably hacked Hillary ' s private server, they should have enough on her that the Clinton Foundation should have to pay them, just to keep the stuff private.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2015-03-10 09:56  

#3  Step 1: Hils puts sensitive state department communications on an unsecured server, thus making them available to any foreign intelligence service smarter than a sack of hammers.

Step 2: "Foreign donors" flood the Clinton slush fund with $$$.
Posted by: Matt   2015-03-10 09:14  

#2  Shouldn't there be SOME foreign donor or pretend donor who will provide evidence to the anti-Hillary camp (either Warren or the Republicans?)
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-03-10 08:13  

#1  The Clintons have assured us that there is nothing there. We should take their word on on it.




ahahahahahahahahahaaaaa *breath* ahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: Frank G   2015-03-10 06:57  

00:00