You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan Wants 'Battlefield' Nukes to Use against Indian Troops
2015-03-08
"We anticipate that Pakistan will continue [its] development of new delivery systems, including cruise missiles and close-range 'battlefield' nuclear weapons to augment its existing ballistic missiles," Stewart said during his opening statement, according to an official transcript.

Tactical nuclear weapons are low-yield, short-range nuclear missiles designed for use against opposing troops on the battlefield, rather than against enemy cities like strategic nuclear weapons. Both the U.S. and Soviet Union deployed them in Europe (among other places) during the Cold War, and Washington and Moscow continue to deploy them today. They are not covered in existing U.S.-Russian arms control treaties like New START.
Are they anything like suitcase nukes? As I recall, the little ones need frequent and very technical maintenance, or they quickly become lovely paperweights. Are Pakistani technicians up to both frequent and very technical?
Posted by:Hupineger Glomomp52169

#7  How are the palm tree doing Alaska Paul, still swaying in the breeze ?

Posted by: Thavins Clase8010   2015-03-08 19:36  

#6  BTW. Presently in Barrow, Alaska. -8F. Global warming not observed. People hunting seals with AR-15s, heh
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-03-08 19:32  

#5  Pak has a death wish

Part of the predominant religion there, AP.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2015-03-08 14:48  

#4  Pak has a death wish
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-03-08 14:00  

#3  Just what you need, small easily transportable nukes in a countries that make government corruption a requirement for the job. What could go wrong?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-03-08 10:42  

#2  there's going to be a disturbingly high chance of either a fizzle or a flat-out no fire.

Not disturbing to Indian troops, one assumes, though the Saudi inventory control men will not be pleased. Thanks, Mike.
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-03-08 10:03  

#1  There's a definite difference between 'battlefield' and 'suitcase'. Either way, they are both needy lil' critters - as are all nuclear weapons - and as such (given the realities of inshallah maintenance) there's going to be a disturbingly high chance of either a fizzle or a flat-out no fire.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2015-03-08 07:41  

00:00