You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Mother Jones: 'Three Hots' is racist and may be making you fat sick
2015-03-06
[Mother Jones] Meals are good, and snacking is bad. Breakfast is the most important meal of the day, and if you eat dinner with your family, you will keep your girlish figure and your kids will be healthier. Taking a lunch break will make you succeed at your job.

Okay, now forget all that. Because as it turns out, the concept of three square meals a day has practically zero to do with your actual metabolic needs. And our dogmatic adherence to breakfast, lunch, and dinner might actually be making us sick.

Skipping to final para:

Instead of obsessing about meal size and frequency, Ochner recommends something simpler: Don't eat when it's time for a meal; eat when you feel hungry. That, he says, is a lost art: In industrialized societies, where food is abundant, we eat because of social cues "or just because something smells good." If we can teach ourselves to pay attention to our own bodies instead of our environment, he says, "that might be the best diet of all."
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  All this time I thought MJ stood for something else.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2015-03-06 17:32  

#8  Gee and all the time I was thinking "three hots and a cot". How foolish of me!
Posted by: illeagle   2015-03-06 17:19  

#7  ...and the government will tell you when you are hungry.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-03-06 15:02  

#6  How about if I just happen to feel hungry when lunchtime rolls around?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-03-06 11:40  

#5  Don't eat when it's time for a meal; eat when you feel hungry.

Certainly looks like a lot of people follow that advice. Chips and Coke 24/7.
Posted by: KBK   2015-03-06 10:42  

#4  Give up breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks? And then give yourself up to the Global Warming god and freeze to death. If anyone is idiotic enough to succumb to this nonsense, they deserve what they get. Not all bad, it does thin out the herd of leftist thinkers(?). These original thinkers (sarc) will go the way of the Shakers who gave up sex and hence reproduction.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-03-06 09:51  

#3  But then family isn't something the left feels is important.

As amply demonstrated by Leftist Donk programs for the inner city for the last 50 years. Springer would be reduced to just trailer park inmates without it.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-03-06 09:26  

#2  Three hots or regularly scheduled meals together not only allows for planning of events and economy of only fixing one meal it allows a family to sit down and share a meal together as a family. It is very important to the family unit.

But then family isn't something the left feels is important. In fact to the left family is all the things listed above by M Murcek.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-03-06 09:01  

#1  Anything at all you do that does not have the Good Leftist seal of approval is:

1) Racis
2) Bad for Gaia
3) Bad for The Children
4) Bad for Whatever
Posted by: M. Murcek   2015-03-06 08:14  

00:00