You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Regulators OK 'net neutrality' rules for Internet providers
2015-02-27
[APNEWS.MYWAY] Internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile now must act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone, under rules approved Thursday by a divided Federal Communications Commission.

The plan, which puts the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone and bans business practices that are "unjust or unreasonable," represents the biggest regulatory shakeup to the industry in almost two decades. The goal is to prevent providers from slowing or blocking web traffic, or creating paid fast lanes on the Internet, said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.
It's not about 'injustice or fairness'... it's about control, but we all knew that.
The 3-2 vote was expected to trigger industry lawsuits that could take several years to resolve. Still, consumer advocates cheered the regulations as a victory for smaller Internet-based companies which feared they would have to pay "tolls" to move their content.
Posted by:Fred

#10   >
Posted by: Hupineger Glomomp52169   2015-02-27 20:53  

#9  Obama killed IEEE P802.1p

Not catchy, but probably true.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-02-27 17:05  

#8  Crazy ~ It would only be fair. We.... 'net privileged' should be held accountable !
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-02-27 13:54  

#7  Soon Internet access will be classified as a basic human right and those on welfare will be entitied to Gigabit broadband at government (or rather ATT/Comcast/Verizon) expense while us working fools have to take whatever remains at high prices since we have to subsidise the drug dealers and gang-bangers.
Posted by: Crazyfool   2015-02-27 13:51  

#6  Does this mean I have a right to an internet connection at my home? Can I get ATT to run a line there? At somebody else's expense?
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-02-27 12:54  

#5  We don't need no stinkin' Congress.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-02-27 12:07  

#4  The regime pushes for more control over the economy by administrative fiat. Obama is pushing for "ammunition control (essentially gun control) via an executive order as well. More over-reach here.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-02-27 09:20  

#3  
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-02-27 01:08  

#2  So now AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and others who spent BILLIONS running cables to each and every house must allow the likes of Google to ride that very expensive infrastructure for a 'reasonable cost' (meaning practically for free).
How socialistic...
And pretty soon Fred will be required to have half the content on rantburg come from the likes of moveon.org and MSNBC - for fairness. And of course using them as a chew toy wouldn't be allowed. Not Politically Correct.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-02-27 00:48  

#1  Had to pass it to find out whats in it - significant portions were NOT available for public comment before passage.

Have we learned nothing? Will the courts put a stop to this executive branch overreach - lawmaking without the legislatiors?
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-02-27 00:27  

00:00