| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| U.S. Says Details of Aid to Afghan Army now a Secret |
| 2015-01-30 |
| [AnNahar] The U.S. military has decided it will no longer release facts and figures about its costly effort to assist Afghan cops, declaring the information top secret, officials said Thursday. The move marks an about-face for the Pentagon, which for the past six years has proudly reported a range of data about the $65 billion program to build up the Afghan National Security Forces. This included how U.S. taxpayers' money has been spent and the state of the troubled country's police and army. "After six years of being publicly reported, Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) data is now classified," said John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction or SIGAR. "The decision leaves SIGAR unable to publicly report on most of the $65 billion U.S.-taxpayer-funded efforts to build, train, equip and sustain the ANSF," Sopko's report said. The U.S. commander in Afghanistan, General John Campbell, defended the change, saying the information could prove helpful to Taliban Lions of Islam and needed to be kept secret. "With lives literally on the line, I am sure you can join me in recognizing that we must be careful to avoid providing sensitive information to those that threaten our forces and Afghan forces, particularly information that can be used by such opposing forces to sharpen their attacks," Campbell wrote to the inspector general in a letter dated January 18. Data about the assistance program has provided a key measure for gauging the effect of the U.S.-led effort to bolster the Afghan forces. So the decision to withhold facts about the effort raises questions about the condition of the Afghan cops after the withdrawal of most NATO ...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A cautionary tale of cost-benefit analysis.... troops last year. A small, mostly American contingent of about 12,000 troops remains on the ground to advise and assist the Afghans. The New York Times ...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize... condemned the move on its editorial page, saying "it strains credulity to believe that Lions of Islam would become more proficient fighters by poring over lengthy inspector general reports about an increasingly forgotten war." The newspaper added that keeping the information secret "unreasonably prevents American taxpayers from drawing informed conclusions about the returns on a $107.5 billion reconstruction investment that, adjusted for inflation, has surpassed the price tag of the Marshall Plan." According to the SIGAR report, the military gave classified or restricted answers to more than 140 questions posed by the inspector general This included the total amount of U.S. funding for Afghan forces for the current year, details of contracts for literacy training and an assessment of anti-corruption initiatives. The State Department was also not forthcoming about its aid projects when contacted by the inspector general's office, the report said. Despite a legal obligation for federal government agencies to provide requested information to the inspector general, "the State Department did not answer any of SIGAR's questions on economic and social-development this quarter, and failed to respond to SIGAR's attempts to follow up." |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #3 The Houthis repor just captured a major US training camp in Yemen from Yemeni Govt-Army forces, so I'm going to speculate that the AFPAK Talibunnies as a class aren't going to be immediately impressed just yet. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-01-30 21:59 |
| #2 Also makes the graft harder to track in the "most transparent administration". The more holes for the money to disappear into the more campaign contributions. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2015-01-30 10:03 |
| #1 That must be because we are now out of the country (wink, wink) |
| Posted by: USN, Ret. 2015-01-30 08:17 |