You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Climate Lysenkoistsscientists beg governments to leave buried fossil fuel reserves in the ground
2015-01-08
[INDEPENDENT.CO.UK] Vast underground reserves of oil, gas and coal should be classified as off limits if the world stands any chance of averting dangerous climate change, a major study of global fossil-fuel deposits has found.

Scientists calculated that a third of global oil reserves, half of gas reserves and more than 80 per cent of coal reserves should remain in the ground as "unburnable" to avoid exceeding the 2C "safe" threshold for global warming.

The scale of the problem facing the climate negotiations in Paris later this year is writ large in the study by Christophe McGlade and Paul Ekins of University College London who have identified the critical fossils fuels and their locations that need to remain untouched and unexploited.

China, Russia and the United States will have to leave their huge deposits of coal -- the dirtiest of the three main fossil fuels -- underground, while the Middle East will need to agree to keep much of its wealth-creating oil and gas reserves where they are.
The scientists, however, will continue to burn lights and use their computers...
Posted by:Fred

#15  Please, they are not scientists. You cannot call yourself a scientist if you do not share your data, encourage others to test your findings and keep your damn politics out of what you are doing. When I wrote my thesis, my opinion was the tiniest portion of the paper. Everything else was the data, good bad or ugly.

Nah, these guys are just leeches and snake oil salesmen.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2015-01-08 20:42  

#14  UK scientists, eh? No more fossil fuel means no more electricity for that big-ass honking computer the Met just built. Unless you want to build nuke plants...

On the plus side, no more computers means no more insanely inaccurate forecasts or bad computer models.
Posted by: SteveS   2015-01-08 17:08  

#13  I blame the tenure system
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-01-08 15:51  

#12  >what ever happened to peak oil?

Ridicule. Like those predicting exponential rises in temperature will receive.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-01-08 15:32  

#11  BTW what ever happened to peak oil?
Posted by: European Conservative   2015-01-08 15:26  

#10  Sod off, Swampy!
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-01-08 15:20  

#9  Go freeze in the dark, assholes.
Posted by: tu3031   2015-01-08 13:24  

#8  The more oil we dig up the stupider they look.
Posted by: Iblis   2015-01-08 12:52  

#7  The greenhouse effect is bollocks, it's a pressure effect.
One way insulators belong with perpetual motion machines.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-01-08 09:50  

#6  Remember, with the 'Greenhouse Effect' all temperatures rise.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-01-08 09:20  

#5  It always was about the oil economy. They are just move obvious about their calls to action now that western oil is pumping the price down and putting the Arab/Russian axis in a bad position.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-01-08 08:53  

#4  Most of the planet's carbon is sequestered in limestone rock, not fossil fuels.
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-01-08 08:33  

#3  Could use a little global warming this morning as the temp is +5F. Where my sister lives in Ohio, it is -6F. Other places are much colder. Are most of the GW econuts in southern California?
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-01-08 08:17  

#2  Saudis pulling their university chairs?
Posted by: 3dc   2015-01-08 00:35  

#1  Meanwhile, Antarctic sea ice sets a record for this time of year.

The mystery is why the albedo (cooling) feedback of more ice doesn't lock us into a Snowball Earth.
Posted by: phil_b   2015-01-08 00:21  

00:00