You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Military gets 'sensitive' under Obama
2014-09-21
[THEHILL] The military is growing more "sensitive" under the B.O. regime, Pentagon observers say, by relaxing long-standing restrictions on soldiers' religious and personal liberties.

The efforts by the Defense Department to adapt to cultural change go beyond the moves to end the controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy and allow women in combat.

In recent weeks, the Pentagon has backed off controversial hairstyle regulations that critics said discriminated against black women and made the phrase "so help me god" optional in the oath for airmen. Earlier this year, the military loosened its rules for soldiers who want to wear turbans or grow religious beards and provided exemptions for having tattoos and piercings.

"We want to make sure we're not offending people," a DOD official told The Hill.

The military seems to be shifting away from many of the more rigid requirements that once defined service in the armed forces in order to keep pace with cultural changes, experts say.

"If I had told you 10 years ago we were going to drop the ban on gays or that women would get into the special forces, you'd say, 'No way,' " said Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center for American Progress, who is a former assistant secretary of defense.

"Well, that's happening," he said.

Mackenzie Eaglen, who formerly worked at the Pentagon and is now a fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said the recent changes might be "slightly more political in nature."

"This president has instituted an impressive array of social change in the Defense Department during his six years," Eaglen said.

She pointed out the Pentagon "seems to be more sensitive to political correctness" these days.

"They're much quicker to respond to things that offend service members," Eaglen said.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Fear the day, Amerika, when most or all of the USDOD is "unionized" + effec a strategic
"defensive force" where the country can't go to war widout the permission of the AFL-CIO + those foreign Govts. now in formal control of the US domestic economy.

E.G. CHINA DAILY > CHINA NOW TRULY OWNS CANADA, NEW [Sino-Canuck] TREATY ALLOWS CHINA TO FORCE CANADA TO CHANGE ITS LAWS.

Iff saidsame new law(s) or regulations interfere or block Chinese investments into Canada.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-09-21 22:44  

#4  
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-09-21 10:51  

#3  Linguistically speaking we no longer fight 'wars'. The PC folks at the White House Press Office Ministry of Truth have struck it from the official vocabulary.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-09-21 09:43  

#2  Do we still fight wars?
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-09-21 09:20  

#1  "We want to make sure we're not offending people," a DOD official told The Hill.

Given that your mission is to close with and destroy the enemy with extreme malice, you have a severe case of schizophrenia. Task Force Smith to the courtesy phone. Insert George Santayana quote here.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-09-21 09:16  

00:00