You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Federal judge to IRS: Explain these "lost" e-mails, please ... under oath
2014-07-11
Posted by:DarthVader

#10  There were two hearings before two judges. A summary is: Here. Note the judge's comments.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-07-11 18:12  

#9  Yes perjury too.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-07-11 17:40  

#8  Contempt? How about perjury.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-07-11 16:22  

#7  Palin doubles down on call for impeachment.
Posted by: Thineng Angailet7166   2014-07-11 15:32  

#6  Last week Obama, leader of the democratic party and self appointed constitutional expert, declared the supreme court to be wrong. His hacks, Reid and Pelosi, Posed the argument they will go around the supreme court. I suppose this will be the first of many federal judges that have decided enough is enough and playing politics with the law has gone far enough. When the IRS testifies over the emails, or more aptly claims the 5th, all hell is going to break loose if these so called activist judges decide our constitution is at risk and they take it on themselves to get things back in order. I just bought a large box of popcorn this will get fun...
Posted by: 49 Pan   2014-07-11 14:36  

#5  Once the judge has the IRS statement as to what happened, he has a baseline for further investigation or comparisons to what Isa has already found. Any determination presented by the IRS should be backed up by evidence or proof, not just a sworn statement. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-07-11 14:12  

#4  The only problem with this is that those who are involved have no compunction about lying under oath. The other problem is that of proof. However, the judge could charge people for contempt if he finds that there is proof they lied under oath.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-07-11 12:53  

#3  Er, bulwark. Also, bois. PIMP.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2014-07-11 11:23  

#2  objectification trigger follows

Helmet hair worn by Lois of Arc
Is no armor to arrows of snark.
For a sexier style,
Males would fall in a pile,
All aquiver awaiting a spark.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2014-07-11 11:19  

#1  I expect a major audit of this judge soon....
Posted by: DarthVader   2014-07-11 10:57  

00:00