You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Dick Cheney: U.S. Will Suffer 'Far Deadlier Attack' Within Next Decade
2014-06-25
[Huffpoo] Former Vice President Dick Cheney offered an extremely morose prediction about the country's future on Tuesday.

Asked on the Hugh Hewitt radio show whether he believes the United States could survive the decade without another attack on the homeland, Cheney said, "I doubt it."

"I think there will be another attack and next time, I think it's likely to be far deadlier than the last one," he added. "Imagine what would happen if somebody could smuggle a nuclear device, put it in a shipping container and drive it down the Beltway outside Washington D.C."
Cheney should not be faulted. He's thinking worst case, outside the box. His and Bush's fault lies in not lining the Memorial Bridge with the heads of the FBI and National Intelligence Agencies immediately following 9/11.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  Yep, Joe, I'm thinkin there will be all kinds of degradation and dissolution of the USA from numerous situations, not counting the attack
Posted by: Thineng Angailet7166   2014-06-25 20:08  

#8  Strange, iff the GOP doesn't act ASAP to save its own arse, IT WILL BE GONE AS A MAJOR ESTABLISHMENT PARTY IN THE USoAMERIKA WIDIN THE SAME TIME FRAME.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-06-25 19:42  

#7  No enemy of the US will ever nuke DC, New York, Boston or any other big city. Why do us a favor?
Posted by: Iblis   2014-06-25 13:54  

#6  More deadly than 2008 attack?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-06-25 13:11  

#5  Keep building a list of deep blue cities. Karma at work. Too late for Detroit, probably be classified as urban renewal.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-06-25 10:32  

#4  San Francisco? Quite unlikely. The terrorist message will no doubt be focused upon the creation of long-term negative effects.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-06-25 10:10  

#3  Naw, I'm thinking those intent on hitting us where we hurt would go for some place with a message.

Because Obama's drone policy is a particular irritant to the Taliban, etc., I would expect the next big hit to be in either Chicago or San Francisco.

Of course if we do have a huge catastrophic terrorist attack here, it would be Bush's fault you know.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2014-06-25 09:53  

#2  Apparently he thinks nuking DC is a bad thing.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-06-25 09:04  

#1  A necessary condition for adopting ROE appropriate to our enemy.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2014-06-25 08:59  

00:00