You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US has no plans to send any of its 35,000 Middle East-based troops into Iraq
2014-06-12
    [DAILYMAIL.CO.UK]
  • The US has 35,000 troops stationed in the Middle East including 10,000 in Kuwait -- plus 10,000 troops, an F-16 detachment and a Patriot missile battery in Jordan
  • President Obama completed his troop withdrawal from Iraq in December 2011, leaving the country in the hands of government security forces
  • The White House said Tuesday that Hillary Clinton deserves credit for 'ending the war in Iraq, responsibly winding down the war in Afghanistan, and decimating and destroying core al-Qaeda'
  • Three GOP senators warned that the Iraq mess is a preview of Afghanistan once the U.S. completes the Obama-led troop draw-down there
  • The Islamic State of Iraq in Syria (ISIS), formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq Islamic State of Iraq, is capturing cities, seizing money and oil, and displacing hundreds of thousands of people
  • America has provided the Iraqi government with copious military materiel but doesn't plan to respond to ISIS's advances with troops
  • Instead, Washington has told Baghdad to 'step up to the plate' and help its people in ways that freeze out terror groups

The current turmoil in Iraq is a feature, not a bug, for the progressive Left in the U.S. (and Western Europe). This is what ANSWER and Code Pink, the World Can't Wait and the rest, all wanted. They wanted Iraq to fail after Saddam's fall.

Why? Because it reinforces, in their minds, their ideology and world-view. America is evil, and therefore anything -- anything! -- we do must fail. If we removed Saddam and helped Iraq to a (somewhat) democratic republic, that must fail. If we chased the Taliban out of Kabul and gave the Afghanis a chance to have a country, that must fail. If we support Israel, Israel must fail (not just fail but splatter).

And most of all -- America is successful, so America must fail.

The 'narrative' here is hard left, progressive and Orwellian. Their Hobbesian ideology can't win in a peaceful, prosperous country so that country must fail. Hence the Cloward–Piven strategy that clearly has been at work the past five years. Mr. Obama's foreign policy is but one part of this. Notice all the different parts of the world that are falling apart at about the same time -- from Iraq to Venezuela, from the South China Sea to Libya, we have major troubles. Notice how this complements the major domestic troubles of the collapse of our borders, the ruinous debt and the take-no-prisoners political approach of the Left.

I suggest that this is not an accident. The Obama administration was not blindsided by the recent collapse of the Iraqi army in the Sunni west of that country. They weren't blindsided by the weakness of the al-Maliki government.

They've known -- and approved.

The real centerpiece of the Obama/Clinton/Kerry mideast strategy is for the middle east to fail. When it does, so does America.

That's the point.
Posted by:Fred

#7  In some ways, Iraq is still sorting out WWI and the Balfour Agreement and that nasty back door agreement to subdivide the ME into French and English fiefdoms.

Common sense then and now would have said you don't put Shia, Sunni and Kurdish folks in the same room and expect them to play nice.

Iraq should have been three countries in 1924 and it looks as if it is going to morph into such an arrangement in 2014. My only regret is how the empty suit pissed away a really good effort at bringing a working democracy to the ME.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2014-06-12 22:43  

#6  I would support shifting troops to Kurdish country, including the Embassy staff. Treat the place as a defacto country but otherwise let Sunni and Shia work out their differences.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2014-06-12 21:43  

#5  Its a Sunni v Shia war where we want both to lose!
Posted by: Slinelet Pelosi7787   2014-06-12 18:43  

#4  I've seen it argued that we had to try, to give us justification for what may, or more accurately, will likely come in the future...the true arc light, rubble bouncing to eliminate the Islamic threat. The Iraqis had a functioning, fairly stable, by regional standards, democracy. But they just couldn't make it work. It goes against their nature to make such a system work. It will not work out well for them. Sad for the innocents.
Posted by: remoteman   2014-06-12 13:24  

#3  Well all those lives spent and people maimed were sure for nothing.

Why is it that all great sacrifices by people and our troops are wasted at the first moment by craven politicians?
Posted by: DarthVader   2014-06-12 09:26  

#2  we'll have troops there - helicopter evacuating terrified embassy staff and refugees from the roof of the embassy.


Deja Vu all over again?
Posted by: Frank G   2014-06-12 08:04  

#1  Â• The White House said Tuesday that Hillary Clinton deserves credit for 'ending the war in Iraq, responsibly winding down the war in Afghanistan, and decimating and destroying core al-Qaeda'

Please run that by me gain.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-06-12 07:10  

00:00