| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| Rep. Mike Rogers: Champ broke the law with Bergahl deal. |
| 2014-06-02 |
| [Breitbart] On Sunday's "State of the Union" on CNN, House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) explained to moderator Candy Crowley why the Obama administration's deal to secure American prisoner of war Bowe Bergdahl's release for five Guantanamo detainees was a bad deal and broke law. According to Rogers, this sends the wrong message to terrorists around the world. And this has what to do with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence? Benghazi who? No, no, no, forget Benghazi. Here... Candy, look, SQUIRREL ! |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #11 Yep, like fu8181 said, I expect that they were tagged. Later, they and their buddies get together to share some goats, and it's like shootin' fish in a barrel. Good times ... Good times. |
| Posted by: rammer 2014-06-02 21:01 |
| #10 and the articles of impeachment will be filed ... |
| Posted by: irishrageboy 2014-06-02 16:44 |
| #9 ...explained to moderator Candy Crowley why the Obama administration's deal to secure American prisoner of war Bowe Bergdahl's release for five Guantanamo detainees was a bad deal and broke law Oooh! Did she rip his face off and eat it for making fun of her boyfriend? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2014-06-02 14:00 |
| #8 AuburnTom, Bergdahl's father confirmed your musings. I just hope they are tagged for future drone zap. |
| Posted by: Flaiger Uneamp8181 2014-06-02 11:14 |
| #7 Obama promised to get rid of Gitmo. Perhaps he is going to release everybody anyway, so he figured he might as well get something in return. |
| Posted by: AuburnTom 2014-06-02 10:35 |
| #6 That would be no dessert. Ruined the joke. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-06-02 09:56 |
| #5 Assuming he broke the law. What is the penalty for this? Fine? No desert? If it doesnt mean jail time it is only one of many transgressions (the pile of which seem to leave many voters unphazed). |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-06-02 09:55 |
| #4 What's one among hundreds? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2014-06-02 09:04 |
| #3 Well, we didn't negotiate with terrorists, not until Champ was anointed. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2014-06-02 08:21 |
| #2 I've just submitted a Mike Ledeen article with attachments from PJ Media entitled Mirrors and Veils: The Bergdahl Complex. As Paul Harvey used to say.... "and now for the rest of the story." |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2014-06-02 08:14 |
| #1 Even if they had been notified, they are not required to give consent. And given the security classification that would have been attached to the notification, they could not have told anybody outside the committee that they had been notified. So, what difference could it have made?Would not think it sensible politically, assuming Bergdahl was indeed a deserter (& probably even if he wasn't.) Clearly makes no sense militarily. We must not know the whole story. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2014-06-02 07:58 |