You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Moslems Denounce Boko Haram's Nigeria Abductions
2014-05-14
[VOA News] Moslems worldwide have condemned the abduction a month ago of more than 200 Nigerian schoolgirls by the Moslem bully boy group Boko Haram.
... not to be confused with Procol Harum, Harum Scarum, possibly to be confused with Helter Skelter. The Nigerian version of al-Qaeda and the Taliban rolled together and flavored with a smigeon of distinctly Subsaharan ignorance and brutality...
Coming a bit late to the indignation, aren't they?
Moslem leaders have criticized Boko Haram's leader, Abubakar Shekau, for using Islamic teachings as his justification for threatening to sell the girls into slavery.
Of course he used Moslem teachings. He's a Moslem.
Others have focused on what they view as a slow response by Nigeria's government to the crisis.
Nigeria's got all that oil money. They'd be well-advised to use it to hire someone to govern them, since they can't manage themselves.
Moslem leader Faisal Suliman, chair of the South Africa Moslem Network (SAMNET), appeared on the South African radio show Voice of the Cape's Breakfast Beat on Wednesday to distance Boko Haram's actions from Islam.
"just a splinter group. Nothing to get excited about. Tut tut."
"This is a totally un-Islamic act. It is contrary to the Sharia and what is in the Koran.
"Yeah! It wudn't the Profit who said 'Kill enemies! Hear da wamentations of dere wimmin!... Not in those words. Certainly not."
"There is no place for this in Islam no matter who does it, regardless of whatever cause they try and perceive it to be," Suliman said.
that sort of thing is the very foundation of Islam, isn't it?
He questioned some of the coverage by mainstream media, whom he claimed were trying to link the kidnappings to the beliefs of Islam. He also questioned the use of words such as "Islamist" and "fundamentalist" to describe the group's actions.
Since that's what they proclaim themselves to be, why shouldn't the press report it that way?
"It was an act worthy of condemnation across all communities, religions and ethnicities, and we are trying to make that clear. But certainly in the mainstream media, it is still being presented with that Islamic connotation," he said.
"Really, we're harmless. Just ignore us, okay? We'll letcha know when it's okay to look."
Posted by:Fred

#6  Betcha every denunciation is couched in terms of "harming Islam" by means of public relations, and not about the act itself -- which is not just permitted by Islam, but emulates the career of Mohammed (bees pee upon him).
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2014-05-14 22:31  

#5  It's a start only if there is a next step.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-05-14 18:13  

#4  But what did he say in Arabic?
Posted by: Barbara   2014-05-14 18:00  

#3  Its one thing for individual or groups of Moslems to condemn it.

Its another for the mosques and madrassas to condemn in general language.

Its still another to have the mosques and madrassas explain why the literalist reading of the Quran, the Hadith and the Sunna is wrong regarding kidnapping. Without the third thing happening, the first two don't really matter much.
Posted by: lord garth   2014-05-14 16:11  

#2  Geez, later to the dance than the Obamas.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2014-05-14 14:54  

#1  It is a start.

Between that and the Grand Imam of the Great Mosque in Mekkah denouncing terrorism, maybe, mainstream Moslems are getting the message that if they really are "the religion of peace" they had better damned sure make sure they don't advocate violence with silence.

Moslem leaders need to get off their butts and tell the world this stuff is not Islam (as I was told many times in Libya by just about everyone I met on the street.)
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2014-05-14 13:56  

00:00