You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Canada's Trudeau Tosses All 32 Liberal Senators from Party
2014-01-30
[An Nahar] Canadian Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau on Wednesday tossed all 32 Liberal senators from his opposition party.

"There are no more Liberal Senators," he announced.

The eldest son of late prime minister Pierre Trudeau said the surprise move was to "remove partisanship and patronage from the Senate," which he called a "deeply negative force."

The senators stripped of their Liberal ties will now sit as independents, he said.

This comes after months of deliberations in the media about what to do with a scandal-plagued Senate that has become increasingly irrelevant and an embarrassment to Canadians.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Tory government has long sought to reform Canada's Senate, but faces opposition from several provinces fearing a dilution of their share of Senate seats, and from senators themselves.

He has asked the Supreme Court for its opinion on its proposals to reform or abolish the Senate.

The main opposition New Democratic Party meanwhile wants the upper house simply abolished and its 105 members shown the door.

Trudeau blamed party allegiances within the Senate for its woes, saying Senators' actions too often reflect "not just what's best for their country or their regions, but what's best for their party."

Under the current system, senators from various regions of Canada are appointed by the governor general on the advice of the prime minister and can hold their seats until they turn 75.

Critics say successive federal governments have stacked it with party hacks, organizers and supporters.
Posted by:Fred

#4  @Procopius2k

That is brilliant. TY. That would solve that.
Posted by: mossomo   2014-01-30 22:59  

#3  House cleaning needed in Washington as well.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-01-30 09:37  

#2  Unfortunately, the Senate in the US is suppose to represent the State's interests (not unions - see Reid). And no, going back to non-elected appointees will not solve the problem as IL has amply demonstrated, they'll just represent the 'machine'. The best I've figured out so far is to give every county or parish an electoral vote in the selection of the state's Senator. That will mean that large metro areas (which were not envisioned by the founders) will not overwhelm the interests of the remainder of the state in protecting its overall interests in the Senate.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-01-30 08:42  

#1  Wow! That's a good start. Can we copy and implement that in the U.S. starting with Reid?
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-01-30 07:10  

00:00