You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
R.I.P A-10 Warthog
2013-09-24
Posted by:Crineck Sholump8581

#19  tw,only the ones who stay on the plantation in the union
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-09-24 22:08  

#18  Except the schools aren't getting lots of money - that is getting diverted to the same ole DNC cronies. (Unions, Activists, Abortion mills, etc...)

Question: Now that the teAchers are giving up their unions where permitted, will they no longer be a favoured constituency?
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-09-24 20:53  

#17  What we are seeing is this bumper sticker turned into policy.

Except the schools aren't getting lots of money - that is getting diverted to the same ole DNC cronies. (Unions, Activists, Abortion mills, etc...)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2013-09-24 12:07  

#16  Tu101. I doubt Marines ever take the Warthog. Marine aircraft requirements include being capable of carrier operation.
Posted by: JFM   2013-09-24 12:06  

#15  I have a suspicion that this is more posturing for sequestration.

"If you don't give me money for global warning studies, I'll retire the A-10!"

In the 80's there used to be a liberal bumber sticker that said:
"wouldn't it be nice if schools had lots of money and the pentagon had to hold a bake sale to pay for its submarines?"

What we are seeing is this bumper sticker turned into policy.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2013-09-24 11:49  

#14  I'll bet the Marines would take them.
Posted by: tu3031   2013-09-24 11:21  

#13  A CAS low level gun run just in front of friendlies is not where I would want a UAV. That control lag could literally be a "killer". Of friendly troops.
Posted by: tipover   2013-09-24 11:15  

#12  But now you wouldn't need all the pilot protection in the A-10.

Yeah right let's just have an unprotected multidollar plane the enemy can bring down with a bean shooter.
Posted by: JFM   2013-09-24 10:25  

#11  So we are going to use a plane worth hundreds of millions of dollars for strafing. Right?
Posted by: gorb   2013-09-24 09:57  

#10  If the Army were smart it would design a UAV around the GAU-8 the same way the A-10 was built around it. But now you wouldn't need all the pilot protection in the A-10.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2013-09-24 09:45  

#9  Reclassify elements of the Air Force like the Russians as the 'Strategic Force' cut the rest out and hand back as the old Army Air Corps. The Fighter Mafia will have its hands full. Note that some in the Army won't be too happy either as the need and funding to design a helicopter to do what an A-10 does won't be in the budget anymore.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-09-24 08:33  

#8  Under the current regime, nothing will be too good for a Red State such as Idaho, and that is very likely just what you'll get.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-09-24 02:31  

#7  Had a "ANG retiree briefing" at Gowen Field (Boise, Idaho) a couple of weeks ago. They didn't sound upbeat about keeping the A-10. And if they were to go I don't know whether the Air National Guard will continue at Gowen unless they were to get F-35's (I wouldn't hold my breath on that one though it has been discussed).
Posted by: tipover   2013-09-24 02:24  

#6  Watch the Taliban 'squirter' try to crawl away from the impact area.

Warthogs in Iraq and Afghanistan saved countless US and ISAF lives. I hate to see them go.

Posted by: Besoeker   2013-09-24 01:52  

#5  Somebody tell them close air support AND tank buster isn't a single mission. I don't want Overlook to be a fast mover! Friendly fire ain't friendly.
Posted by: Skidmark   2013-09-24 01:25  

#4  They have a mighty fine Service record.
Posted by: newc   2013-09-24 01:11  

#3  This was done once before, moved to the USAF reserve and then when tried to move to the Army ( Army wanted them to augment helos for CAS) the flyboys suddenly brought them back to the front lines. Great aircraft, but not sexy. but then again, if you gotta wear a hankie around your neck to get the girls.....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2013-09-24 00:56  

#2  Real reason? F22 and f35 are what they want to go to, even if they aren't as effective in the CAS role for LIC/COIN. Fecking zoomies, they forget who it always comes down to: boots on the ground. Short of nukes, that's what it takes. Give them to the Army and USMC.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-09-24 00:34  

#1  Move them to Ft Rucker and let the Army fly them. Us dogs love those 'hawgs. They work great with helicopters, hammer/anvil teams. USAF fighter mafia always hated mud movers anyway. Flight warrants probably do just as well, if not better, as dedicated ground support pilots. US Army operates other fixed wing, so just add these in.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-09-24 00:27  

00:00