You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Wegmans cuts health benefits for part-time workers
2013-07-12
[BUFFALONEWS] Et tu, Wegmans?

The Rochester-based grocer that has been continually lauded for providing health insurance to its part-time workers will no longer offer that benefit.

Until recently, the company voluntarily offered health insurance to employees who worked 20 hours per week or more. Companies are required by law to offer health insurance only to full-time employees who work 30 hours or more per week.

Several Wegmans employees confirmed part-time health benefits had been cut and said the company said the decision was related to changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act.

However,
a clean conscience makes a soft pillow...
part-time employees may actually benefit from Wegmans' decision, according to Brian Murphy, a partner at Lawley Benefits Group, an insurance brokerage firm in Buffalo.

"If you have an employee that qualifies for subsidized coverage, they might be better off going with that than a limited part-time benefit," Murphy said.

That's because subsidized coverage can have a lower out-of-pocket cost for the insured employee while also providing better benefits than an employer-paid plan.

Under the Affordable Care Act, part-time employees are not eligible for health insurance subsidies if their employer offers insurance.

"It's a win-win. The employee gets subsidized coverage, and the employer gets to lower costs," Murphy said.

"As a private company, we don't share specifics of our employee benefits programs. It's a given that health care reform will result in some changes to our benefits program, but it will not change our commitment to meeting the needs of our employees," Wegmans said in a statement.
Posted by:Fred

#6   Yeah, it's a win-win, except for the folks subsidizing the low-cost insurance. They get to pay more and get less.

But hey! I guess that's the point of income redistribution!

"...he robs from the poor and gives to the rich. Stupid bitch."
Posted by: Dopey Sinatra   2013-07-12 16:11  

#5  I think Oregon was being sarcastic, AP - but that's just me. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara   2013-07-12 15:17  

#4  From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs) is a slogan popularised by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2013-07-12 14:44  

#3  The phrase is reminiscent of something, that just keeps one step from my consciousness.

What could it be? Where have I seen this before?
.
Posted by: OregonGuy   2013-07-12 12:47  

#2  To each according to his need. From each according to his ability.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2013-07-12 11:37  

#1  Yeah, it's a win-win, except for the folks subsidizing the low-cost insurance. They get to pay more and get less.

But hey! I guess that's the point of income redistribution!
Posted by: Bobby   2013-07-12 06:10  

00:00