You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Syria: Assad's rearmed and regrouped forces sense turn of the tide
2013-06-06
[GUARDIAN.CO.UK] Bullet-scarred and shattered buildings, eerily empty streets, makeshift hospitals, rumours of massacres and triumphant government soldiers riding around on tanks are all grimly familiar images after more than two years of Syria's bloody and escalating war.

Wednesday's scenes in the central town of Qusair, which was retaken by Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad
One of the last of the old-fashioned hereditary iron-fisted fascist dictators...
's forces after a two-week battle, certainly represent a significant defeat for the rebels, who are outgunned, divided among themselves and still uncertain of gaining wider international support.

It is too early to assess whether the tide has turned definitively in favour of the Assad regime, though Qusair is the latest in a string of victories. Most independent experts still believe there is little chance -- an estimated 90,000 have already died since March 2011 -- of an outright military victory by either side. But the president is likely to feel emboldened, and is prepared for a long haul.

"Qusair was billed as being of strategic importance," said a diplomat who monitors the crisis closely. "Its loss is a blow for the rebels and a welcome boost for the regime. But it is not Aleppo or Homs. These things ebb and flow."

The timing, however, means that it will now be even harder to find a negotiated solution to the Syrian conflict. On a day when senior US, Russian and UN diplomats met in Geneva to discuss convening a new peace conference, now put back from this month to July at the earliest, prospects for meaningful talks between the government and its opponents look poorer than ever.

Syria's well-oiled state media machine was busy trumpeting the achievement of its "heroic" army in restoring "security and stability" to Qusair, which lies near the Lebanese border on the route that links Damascus to Homs and the heartland of the Assad family's minority Alawite sect. The victory was a "clear message" to all involved in aggression against Syria, said the army, especially what it called -- in a characteristic flourish of pure propaganda -- "the Zionist enemy and its agents."

It made no reference to Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia militia now fighting openly with Assad and risking importing an increasingly sectarian war back across the border. Its role in the fighting, now out in the open, has been crucial.

Qusair is the most important gain made by the regime in recent months. New tactics and offensives on new fronts -- the rural Ghota area east of Damascus, Jobar on the edge of the city, around Deraa in the south and Idlib in the north -- have all seen rebel fighters checked or routed.

Qusair's capture cuts off an important supply line linking the rebels with their supporters in Leb. Conversely, it secures access for Hezbollah into Syria. "Qusair has fallen," proclaimed jubilant posters in the Dahiyah, the Beirut suburb that is the Shia militia's stronghold.

But the government still needs to take control of the area around Qusair. "In terms of wider strategy they need the countryside -- and that means dozens of villages which will be hard to take because they will have to disperse their forces," predicted the London based Syrian commentator Malik al-Abdeh.
Posted by:Fred

#8  It's all BS, dewds. Don't believe a word of it.
Posted by: Cheager Angoluque6848   2013-06-06 21:34  

#7  The pro assad forces took two weeks to take a relatively small town near the Lebanon border where the Hezbollah troops had favorable logistics.


I believe that's where the rebels had favorable logistics. Qusair is near the northernmost part of Lebanon, where Lebanese Sunnis dominate. Hezbollah is based in South Lebanon, where the vast majority of Lebanon's Shiites live. To put things in perspective, it took the Marines 1-1/2 months to clear Fallujah, which had 2x-3x the population, and they had pinpoint air and artillery support. And they were Marines. The Syrian military is merely relearning the lessons of Hama. It needs to concentrate its forces and take apart rebel cities one by one. It's not fighting all the Sunnis in Syria - it's only fighting the people who feel they have a chance of becoming big shots in a new regime and are willing to roll the dice with their lives in hopes of doing so.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-06-06 19:32  

#6  Both sides lose no just the side that starts it loses just look at history, Hitler Bunker D-Day! The right people will lose and lose big!
Posted by: Snise Cruter2274   2013-06-06 18:01  

#5  g(rom), I agree. While I feel sorry for the ordinary Syrian who is caught in the crossfire, I really hope both sides lose.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-06-06 14:54  

#4  Lets see how they do in the countryside.

Let's hope it's long, bloody, and destroys a lot of infrastructure.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-06-06 11:35  

#3  The indigenous fighters in Syria (both pro assad and anti assad) are now less important than the exogenous fighters (Hezbollah for assad and various jihadis against assad)

The pro assad forces took two weeks to take a relatively small town near the Lebanon border where the Hezbollah troops had favorable logistics.

Lets see how they do in the countryside.
Posted by: lord garth   2013-06-06 11:33  

#2  Sunni arabs outnumber Alawites 6 to 1, which means they will win a war of attrition.

Wars of attrition are conflicts in which two parties are rough balance. Once Assad is able to starve the rebels of manpower and weaponry by controlling most of Syria's territory, the trench warfare stops and the only thing left to do is to mop up. The Greeks, Mongols, Turks and Arabs (during the expansion of Muhammad's armies through North Africa, Persia, Central and South Asia) are only a few of the more notable examples of minorities ruling majorities. Most ordinary people of the majority aren't Spartans bred for war and they're not willing to risk their lives to become serfs under a new autocrat. And the strong prospect of a new leader just like the old one has been the reality of life in the Middle East, and most of the non-Western world. Always has been and perhaps always will be.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-06-06 07:02  

#1  Sunni arabs outnumber Alawites 6 to 1, which means they will win a war of attrition.
Posted by: phil_b   2013-06-06 01:34  

00:00