You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White House Backs Laws to Protect Press Sources
2013-05-16
[An Nahar] The White House threw its weight Wednesday behind a bid to pass a law to strengthen journalists' rights to protect their sources, amid controversy over the seizure of a news agency's phone records.

Following allegations that federal Sherlocks had gone too far in their move against the News Agency that Dare Not be Named, a front man said President Barack Obama
Republicans can come along for the ride, but they've got to sit in the back...
had contacted politicians to ask that the bill be brought forward.

"The president has long supported media shield legislation in the Senate during the 2008 campaign and as president," Carney said, adding that Obama had spoken to Senator Chuck Schumer
Senator-for-life from New York, renowned for his love of standing in front of cameras. Schumer has been a professional politician since 1975, when disco was in flower.
to press his support for the bill.

"We are glad to see that that legislation will be reintroduced, because he believes strongly that we need to provide the protections to the media that this legislation would do," Carney told news hounds.

This week's revelation that Sherlocks probing alleged leaks of secret or classified information had secretly obtained phone records for numbers used by News Agency that Dare Not be Named news hounds triggered a political firestorm.

Several commentators and a coalition of media organizations accused Obama's administration of trampling on press freedoms in its pursuit of government leaks and whistleblowers.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Barack Obama has somebody else's back...AGAIN!
Posted by: tu3031   2013-05-16 21:38  

#6  AlanC -- those were my first thoughts too. Seems like a similar take on what transpired when blogging became popular -- and worse! -- influential. They are not journalists. Perish the thought.
Posted by: Dopey Sinatra9196   2013-05-16 17:17  

#5  White House Backs Laws to Protect Press Sources Says one thing, but does opposite
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-05-16 14:44  

#4  The White House's weight isn't what it used to be a couple of weeks ago. Too much cynical manipulation on full display.
Posted by: Muggsy Mussolini1226   2013-05-16 12:36  

#3  Obama laws are NO guarantee of any kind.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2013-05-16 11:41  

#2  Would it be cynical or paranoid of me to point out the danger that this becomes a backdoor to press registration??

Who and how decides what/who is a journalist & journalism? Would Joe Citizen posting on Twitter or FB or a blog be shielded if one found out about mal or misfeasance by the elite?
Posted by: AlanC   2013-05-16 11:10  

#1  "See baby? I only beat you cuz I love you so much"
Posted by: Frank G   2013-05-16 08:10  

00:00