You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
North Korea Declares 'State of War' with Seoul
2013-03-31
[An Nahar] North Korea on Saturday declared it had entered into a "state of war" with South Korea and warned Seoul and Washington that any provocation would swiftly escalate into an all-out nuclear conflict.
Once you push stupid to a certain point there's no further you can go.
The United States said it took the announcement "seriously," even though it followed a familiar pattern, while South Korea largely dismissed it as an old threat dressed in new clothing.

It was the latest in a string of dire-sounding pronouncements from Pyongyang that have been matched by tough warnings from Seoul and Washington, fueling international concern that the situation might spiral out of control.

"As of now, inter-Korea relations enter a state of war and all matters between the two Koreas will be handled according to wartime protocol," the North said in a government statement carried by the Korean Central News Agency.

"The long-standing situation of the Korean peninsula being neither at peace nor at war is finally over," the statement said, adding that any U.S. or South Korean provocation would trigger a "full-scale conflict and a nuclear war."

The two Koreas have technically remained at war for the past six decades because the 1950-53 Korean War concluded with an armistice rather than a peace treaty.

The North had announced earlier this month that it was ripping up the armistice and other bilateral peace pacts signed with Seoul in protest against South Korea-U.S. joint military exercises.

Voiding the ceasefire theoretically opened the way to a resumption of hostilities, although the armistice was approved by the U.N. General Assembly, and both the U.N. and South Korea repudiated the North's unilateral withdrawal.
Posted by:Fred

#1  Again, by most accounts the DPRK per se can strike the ROK + Japan but it does N-O-T have the long-range Mil Assets, Nukulaar or Otherwise, to strike Guam + Hawaii let alone CONUS-NORAM - CHINA + PLA, HOWEVER, DOES.

IOW, the DPRK by itself cannot attack or hit Guam + Hawaii by itself. In any case, any DPRK-specific long-range Strategic Mil Assets - Conventional + Strategic-Tactical Nuclear - would be controlled by China, NOT THE DPRK. THE MAJOR COMMUNIST POWERS DO NOT ALLOW THEIR LESSOR SATELLITE OR VASSAL STATES TO HAVE OR CONTROL ANY WEAPONS OR MILSYS - THEIRS OR INDIGENOUS - THAT BE USED FOR STRATEGIC PURPOSES.

Which is the same as saying most or all of the DPRK Military is not DPRK-controlled.

CHINA = COLD WAR USSR/CPSU = ALLOWING THE DPRK [USSR = Warsaw Pact/post-1945 Commie Eastern Europe] CERTAIN OR SELECT "LOCAL AUTONOMY" =
N-O-T THE SAME AS GIVING THE DPRK "SOLE/
SOVEREIGN CONTROL". As the DPRK's existential guarantor, China does that to control the Political agendum + protect PLA Armies, not the DPRK, in a NucWar-possible environment agz the US-Allies.

The head of North Korea's Strategic Rocket Forces + Military is a CHINESE GENERAL, NOT A NORTH KOREAN GENERAL OR EVEN KIM JONG UN HIMSELF.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-31 20:32  

00:00