You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Norks Vow Dire Revenge™ Against More B-52 Flights
2013-03-21
North Korea warned of "strong military counter-action" if the U.S. again flies B-52 bombers over the Korean peninsula, with two flights this month after the totalitarian regime threatened preemptive nuclear strikes.

The U.S. Pacific Air Forces Command successfully carried out the latest training flight, 7th Air Force spokeswoman Maj. Richelle Dowdell said in an e-mail yesterday without giving further details. A B-52 can carry nuclear warheads and air-to- ground missiles with a range of 3,000 kilometers (1,864 miles).

The U.S. is increasing its defense capability in the region after Kim Jong Un's regime this month threatened to use atomic weapons in response to tougher United Nations sanctions. Tensions on the peninsula are the highest since at least 2010, with China also indirectly criticizing U.S. plans to bolster a regional anti-missile shield.
Missile defense? Didn't the Democrats assure us that ballistic missile defense would never work?
Yesterday's sortie is an "unpardonable" provocation, introducing a mechanism to deliver a strategic nuclear strike to the Korean Peninsula "at a time when its situation is inching close to the brink of war," an unidentified North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman said today in a statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency.

The North is closely watching the situation and "the hostile forces will never escape its strong military counter- action" if the B-52s fly sorties over the the peninsula again, according to the KCNA statement.

The first B-52 flight came on March 8 as part of joint U.S.-South Korea military drills, Defense Department spokesman George Little said in a March 18 statement. He said such flights are routine. The bomber was flown out of Andersen Air Force Base in Guam in the first week of the annual two-month Foal Eagle exercise which ends April 30.

"We are drawing attention to the fact we have extended deterrence capabilities that we believe are important to demonstrate in the wake of recent North Korean rhetoric," Little said. "We are in the midst right now of sending a very strong signal that we have a firm commitment to the alliance with our Republic of Korea allies."
"Absent that, we still like watching the North Koreans foam at the mouth," he added.
Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter on March 18 announced during his visit to South Korea that a second flight would take place the next day. He traveled to Seoul to reaffirm the commitment to deter North Korea at a time the U.S. faces multi-billion dollar defense budget cuts.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  I'm not in the habit of running away from enemies.

IMO the key advantage of Guam + US-Allies is that the DPRK, SSSSHHHH ... CCCCCC aka CHINA + PLA, desire to have China rival Nippon + also ROK, etc. ASEAN under their wing, NOT the US ; + also desire to keep Russia neutral AMAP ALAP in any mil conflict which does occurs - ditto as per Russia for US-Allies.

Hopefully the above will induce China to wage either a wholly Conventional war, or in the alternate a Limited NucWar using select Tacnuke strikes agz high-value targets in Nippon, ROK, Taiwan, + possibly Philippines WHERE THESE COUNTRIES WILL BE DAMAGED, BUT NOT DESTROYED.

Iff China does decide on conventional war, then IMO the real threat to Guam may be via Airborne Forces, PLAAF LR strategic bomber attack, + PLAN Submarine Ops, + COMMANDO/SPECOPS.

GUAM'S PROB = MOST OF OUR GUAM NATIONAL GUARD IS NOW OVER IN AFGHANISTAN AS PER 2014. GUAM HAS [three?] USN SSNS BUT LITTLE OR NOTHING TO SERIOUSLY DEFEND AGZ PLAAF STRATEGIC BOMBERS + CHIN AIRBORNE FORCES/PARATROOPERS, LET ALONE BALLISTIC MISSLE DEFENSE AGZ PLA 2nd ARTY.

Lastly, I believe the CCCC/CPC, CMC + PLA are well aware of their own internal defects ala the PLA - as per WORLD MIL FORUM, CHINESE ANALYSTS ARE WORRIED THAT PLA TROOPS MAY HAD BECOME "EFFEMINATE" DUE TO NOT BEING MILITARILY ACTIVE OVERSEAS IN SUPPORT OF CHINA'S FOREIGN POLICY OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS-PLUS.

Iff the WMF Artics are correct, then Guam + US-Allies will likely have the added advantage of the PLA Officer, Senior NCO Corps being overly "rusty" or incompetent/defective in all things Local + Campaign MilOps, at least during the initial phases or periods of a US-China-Japan, etal. military conflict. OVER TIME, HOWEVER, AS THE MIL CONFLICT GOES ON CHINA + PLA WILL REMOVE = "PROMOTE"? PROBLEMATIC MILITARY LEADERS + REPLACE SAME WID TRULY CAPABLE OR PROFICIENT LEADERS.

Again, iff China backs down vee the US + Japan, its NOT GODD for anti-US Globalists + aligned whom desire to see the US permanently suborned under OWG + NAU 2015, ETC. where the US is weak + no longer the World's #1 Superpower. WILL POTUS BAMMER FIGHT, OR WILL HE "KEEP THE US OUT OF [Nuclear?]WAR" BY CLAIMING THE SEQUESTRATION + EXCESSIVELY DEBT-RIDDEN USA CANNOT AFFORD TO ECON INTERVENE, HENCE CANNOT MILITARILY INTERVENE, ON BEHALF OF JAPAN OR ANY OF ITS OVERSEAS ALLIES ANYMORE???

* GLOBAL TIMES > US FED [Federal Reserve] CONTINUES MONETARY EASING MOVES TO STIMULATE [Economic] GROWTH.

The US has to keep buy Buy BUY B-U-Y BBBUUUYYYING
US$85.0BILYUHN PER MONTH ON THE BOND MARKET to support itself.

US $85.0BILYUHN PER MONTH FOR 12 MONTHS = Read, CHINA.

* REAL CLEAR POLITICS ARTIC = denotes that the Bammer is NOT interested in a PAR/BALANCED BUDGET, ONLY A "FISCALLY SUSTAINABLE" ONE.

Read, WHERE INCOMING REVENUES ARE SUCH THAT THE ALREADY MASSIVE US WELFARE-NANNY STATE + DEFICIT SPENDING IS MAINTAINED IFF NOT EXPANDED, I.E. "STAYS IN THE DEEP RED"; + ECON, BUDGET, + NATIONAL COLLAPSE IS ROUTINELY AVOIDABLE.

[PRE-WW2 "MUNICH CONFERENCE" here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-21 23:41  

#8  Unpardonable!
Posted by: Glong Phutle2800   2013-03-21 14:09  

#7  Penn State > Guam > Cloud

No boat necessary.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-03-21 13:37  

#6  Joe don't need no stinkin boat.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-03-21 13:34  

#5  Joe, do you have a boat?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2013-03-21 12:05  

#4  No blood for Pacific Plates!
Posted by: Shipman   2013-03-21 09:28  

#3  Lest we fergit, CHINA = claims Guam-CNMI as Chinese territory, albeit US controlled, due to the Marianas being on a sub-shelf of the UW continental shelf extending from the coasts of mainland China.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-21 02:38  

#2  More ...

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > RUSSIAN RADIO MEDIA: CHINESE DRAGON + RUSSIAN BEAR JOIN FORCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC TO CUT OFF THE AMERICAN EAGLE [+ US Allies]. DEBT-RIDDEN USA NEEDS TIME TO DEPLOY TROOPS FROM CONUS FOR THE DEFENSE OF SOUTH KOREA, JAPAN, + HAWAII - CHINA + PLA CAN EASILY USE THIS TIME TO LEAVE, ENTER THE SEA OF JAPAN IN FORCE, WHILE RUSSIA CAN SEND 36 TU-22M3 LR STRATEGIC BOMBERS TO ATTACK + DESTROY THE US BASE ON GUAM.

* SAME > NEW US SECDEF CHUCK HAGEL CALLS ON PENTAGON TO REVISE US MILITARY STRATEGIES TO FIT WID DESIRED USDOD BUDGET REDUCTIONS OF UP TO US$1.0TRILYUHN. US NO LONGER DESIRES TO ACT LIKE A "GLOBAL" POWER, BUT NOW AS A "REGIONAL" POWER. US GROUND FORCES TO BE REDUCED IN MATCHING SCALE TO LOWER THE PROBABILITY OF THE US ENGAGING IN UNILATERAL MILITARY ACTIONS.

* SAME > BEIJING EXPERT: US DOES NOT WANT NORTH KOREA CRISIS TO TAKE DOWN CHINA; PENINSULA SHOULD GIVE UP ONE-SIDED DENUCLEARIZATION BID.

IIUC, this Pert is saying that off the DPRK refuses to denuclearize, the ROK should unilaterally nuclearize in response, + that both the US + China should approve.

* GLOBAL TIMES > OPED: US CAN'T PIVOT TO ASIA-PACIFIC WID ITS FEET BOGGED DOWN IN THE MIDDLE EAST.

Yuuuppp.

ADVANTAGE - CHINA + PLA, IRAN + IRAN NAVY [IRGC?], NUKE-ARMED PAKISTAN + POST-2014 NOT-THE-MUSLIM-BROTHERHOOD TALIBAN GOVT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-21 02:24  

#1  The B-52 is a strategic bomber thus any NOKOR action agz same is by definition a CHINESE action.

* BIG NEWS NETWORK > [MSNBC = KCNA] KIM JONG-UN THREATENS TO ATTACK US BASES IN THE PACIFIC [+ BTW also South Korea while he's at it].

Reminds of me of an old dream/vision = "ITS CALLED THE OSCAR-CLASS [Oscar II] SUBMARINE".

Motherly Commie/PLA Airborne coming to Guam-CNMI???

D *** NG IT, I KNOW FOR A FACT FROM "RED DAWN II" THAT YOU BOYZ WERE SUPPOSED TO ATTACK WASHINGTON + OREGON, NOT GUAM'S COCOS ISLAND!

* SAME > NORTH KOREA ISSUES RED ALERT, ORDERS MILITARY TO "STAND BY", for possible immediate counter-attack = "immediate counter-response" like Iran.

* YONHAP > KCNA: NORTH KOREA ARMY IS READY FOR COMBAT.

IIRC RELATED SAME > VIDEO: NORTH KOREAN SOLDIER: WE WIL REMOVE THE US FROM THE EARTH.

* SAME > EDITORIAL: NORTH KOREA STANDS AT A CROSSROADS.

YUUUUPPPP.

See also RELATED TOPIX [old] > NORTH KOREA THROWS DOWN THE GAUNTLET.

> Famine/Econ-led Collapse = Chinese takeover.
> Sino-DPRK FTAS = Chinese takeover.
> DPRK War agz US-ROK-Japan-UNCOM = Chinese takeover.

Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-21 02:02  

00:00