You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
U.S. ramping up missile defense against N. Korea amid new threats
2013-03-16
[CBSNEWS] The Pentagon announced Friday it will spend $1 billion to add 14 interceptors to a West Coast-based missile defense system, responding to what it called faster-than-anticipated North Korean progress on nuclear weapons and missiles.

Citing a "series of irresponsible and reckless provocations" by Pyongyang, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said he is determined to ensure protection of the U.S. homeland and stay ahead of the North Korean missile threat. He acknowledged that the interceptors already in place to defend against potential North Korean missile launches have had poor test performances.

"We will strengthen our homeland defense, maintain our commitment to our allies and partners, and make clear to the world that the United States stands firm against aggression," Hagel told a Pentagon news conference.

The Pentagon intends to add the 14 interceptors to 26 already in place at Fort Greely, Alaska. That will expand the system's ability to shoot down long-range missiles in flight before they could reach U.S. territory. In addition to those at Greely, the U.S. also has four missile interceptors at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif.

Hagel said the 14 extras should be in place by September 2017 but will not be deployed until they have been adequately tested.
According to my sometimes faulty math, that's four years from now, more like four and a half. Pudgeland is fulminating even as we speak blog.
"The reason we're advancing our program here for homeland security is to not take any chances, is to stay ahead of the threat and to assure any contingency," Hagel said.
That statement makes no sense. Is my arithmetic wrong? Do we live in Cloud Kookoo Land?
Posted by:Fred

#3  That statement makes no sense. Is my arithmetic wrong? Do we live in Cloud Kookoo Land?

Totally nuts and useless in the short term. More like 'stimulus' money.

I'd be watching ship movements (Ticos & Burkes, I think) for signs of actual response to the Norks. Assuming we have the money for fuel to leave port. (OMG! We're turning into the fUSSR!!11!!!)
Posted by: SteveS   2013-03-16 13:00  

#2  that doofus Hagel makes me cringe every time he speaks
Posted by: Frank G   2013-03-16 10:30  

#1  Reagan v. Obama on Star Wars

Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2013-03-16 03:02  

00:00