| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| Another Look at the Withdrawal from Afghanistan |
| 2013-01-12 |
| What Obama didn't mention is that this surge and this strategy were not a success. He'd treated the strategy as an experiment; he gave it 18 months to work, and his generals assured him that would be enough time for the Afghan military to take the lead in a majority of the country's districts, even though some of them knew very well it would take longer. They gambled that enough progress would be made to convince the president to give them more time and more troops. They gambled wrong. After 18 months, almost to the day, Obama announced that he would start pulling out all 33,000 surge troops--and not replace them with any new ones. This too he publicly presented as a victory, and by the same rationale: bin Laden had been killed, al-Qaida decimated, Taliban foot soldiers routed. But the goals of the surge--the goals of the counterinsurgency strategy--had not been accomplished. Obama simply--and wisely--rejected them; the experiment was over; he wasn't going to double down. How many years - and dead or maimed Americans & others - since Bush essentially 'declared victory and left' for Iraq? |
| Posted by:Glenmore |
| #3 The Afghan army may have a few minimally competent units. However, the Afghan air force barely exists. The reasons for this are many (Karzai's own fears of Afghans in planes is one reason). Anyway, without an air force to support ground ops and evacuate the injured, it will be a happy day for the taliban. |
| Posted by: lord garth 2013-01-12 19:40 |
| #2 Taliban foot soldiers routed??? No, they are just layin' low, keeping their blades sharp & practicing their beheading skills for later. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2013-01-12 11:54 |
| #1 More: "The policy that Obama now pursues—and has been since the middle of 2011 (that is, 18 months after he put the counterinsurgency experiment in motion)—is essentially Biden’s policy." |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2013-01-12 09:51 |