You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Fossil Find Challenges Tree of Life as We Know it
2012-12-13
[An Nahar] Organisms long thought to have been the ancestors of early marine creatures may in fact have lived on land, said a fossil study Wednesday that may prompt an overhaul of the tree of animal life.

If correct, the finding could challenge the commonly held theory that life had thrived in the oceans for hundreds of millions of years before spreading to land.

The fossils, dubbed Ediacaran and dated to 542-635 million years ago, were unearthed in south Australia in 1946, and were long thought to have been the remains of jellyfish, worms and flowery seafloor-dwelling creatures known as sea pens.

Now a geological scientist from the University of Oregon, using state-of-the-art chemical and microscopic analysis techniques, has concluded the fossils more likely belonged to land-dwelling organisms and were not animals at all.

They may have been lichen -- a composite of a fungus and an algae or bacteria -- or colonies of micro-organisms.

"The discovery has implications for the tree of life because it removes Ediacaran fossils from the ancestry of animals," said Gregory Retallack, author of the study published in the journal Nature.

The fossils represent "an independent evolutionary radiation of life on land that preceded by at least 20 million years the Cambrian evolutionary explosion of animals in the sea," he wrote.

Retallack added this did not mean that all Ediacaran fossils everywhere were terrestrial.

If his theory is correct, it would indicate that some organisms mastered the transition from marine to non-marine life much earlier than currently thought, Paul Knauth of Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration wrote in a comment on the report.

It may even "support the possibility that the transition went the other way".

In a separate comment, Shuhai Xiao of the Virginia Tech department of geosciences called the proposition dubious, and stressed it "would represent a fundamental change in our picture of evolution".
Posted by:Fred

#11  Nothing mysterious about it, Frank.

After all, they all voted Democrat.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-12-13 21:51  

#10  even more mysteriously, several voted in the last election
Posted by: Frank G   2012-12-13 21:30  

#9  I have some very nice crinoids and a Lampshade shell I found in southern Kentucky and a trilobite and some ferns I found near Birmingham, Alabama.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2012-12-13 19:00  

#8  How about three roots which support nine worlds of creatures?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-12-13 16:52  

#7  Looks like this will need "further study".
Johnson, where's that grant paperwork?
Posted by: tu3031   2012-12-13 15:39  

#6  How do you get the most attention / money?

Make extraordinary, sweeping claims on the basis of minimal evidence.

Worked like a champ for the Gerbil Warming crowd.
Posted by: AlanC   2012-12-13 15:33  

#5  They said that about Triffids too, until it was too late.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2012-12-13 11:16  

#4  sadly, lichens don't make for good villains in sci fi 'back to the past' movies

"Look out Jim, you'll get a stain on your shoe" just doesn't have the same ring as "Look out Jim the Tyrannosaurus is after you"
Posted by: lord garth   2012-12-13 11:14  

#3  Obviously some of the the lifeforms the Old Martians brought with them when they left home as their planet started to lose atmosphere and die. The only remaining traces here on Earth are the Ediacaran fossils and LISP, the native tongue of the Old Ones.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-12-13 10:53  

#2  Their brains only hold room for one "Science" fact at a time. Two facts causes overload, panic attacks and screaming about doom cause nature is going to kill us.
Posted by: Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division   2012-12-13 08:44  

#1  I have an Ediacaran fossil jellyfish in the shed in Adelaide. Found it in a creek bed near Hawker.
Did Mr Retallack's theory mention all the current ripples in the rocks containing the Ediacara fossils? No?
Posted by: Grunter   2012-12-13 08:27  

00:00