You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Election 2012
White House details 'destructive' spending cuts
2012-09-14
With excruciating detail, the White House's budget office on Friday laid out exactly where it will have to cut $109 billion from federal spending in January, including $11.1 billion from Medicare and $54.7 billion from defense spending.

The defense cuts include $21.5 billion from operations and maintenance for the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines and the reserves and National Guard, and nearly $1.4 billion from military aide to Afghanistan, with tens of billions coming from procurement and other Pentagon accounts.

"The report leaves no question that the sequestration would be deeply destructive to national security, domestic investments, and core government functions," the White House's budget office said in the report.

Everything from fencing and technology along the U.S.-Mexico border to the government's own internal watchdogs to local environmental programs are also on the chopping block.

The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce, where staffing levels and salaries would be docked more than 8 percent almost across the board.

Also facing slashes are the National Institutes of Health, which would see a $2.5 billion cut, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which would have to trim $464 million, according to the 394-page report, issued by the White House Office of Management and Budget in response to a law.

And at a time when embassy security is under question following the recent attacks, that account would be cut by $129 million.
Why is it that when teh 0ne is fund raising and going to parties I also get visions of Nero fiddling while Rome burned?
Posted by:DarthVader

#9  reports earlier this week that many defense contractors intend to issue the 60 day pre-layoff notice. it hits just before the election. wonder if this is the reason for Bo's concern, now....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2012-09-14 22:18  

#8  Homeland Security would be a great place to start.
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-09-14 20:47  

#7  I would have started with TSA, EPA, FDA, USDA, NEA, and several isms.
Posted by: Dale   2012-09-14 19:40  

#6  "The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce"

And your point.... ?
Posted by: Barbara   2012-09-14 19:07  

#5  The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce, where staffing levels and salaries would be docked more than 8 percent almost across the board.

Every cloud has a silver lining. I'm all for a net 10% cut. Start with the entire Dept. of Education & Energy and go on from there.
Posted by: AlanC   2012-09-14 17:42  

#4  It's seedy pols, not WoT.

I wouldn't mind a $109 billion cut in the budget. On a $4300 billion budget, the proposed sequestration is a nice first step.

Go ahead and try to scare me, President Ladies-Tee.

I say this as an NIH grant holder. The cuts will be painful to many, but we can't keep spending at the current rate.
Posted by: Steve White   2012-09-14 17:30  

#3  But it'as all the Trunks fault! Send me FORWARD! I have a PLAN! - BHO
Posted by: Bobby   2012-09-14 17:14  

#2  Seedy Pols works fir me, DarthVader.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-09-14 16:57  

#1  Oh, and mods I have really no idea where this should go. Seedy pols, because of the politics, but at the same time WoTB since it will gut a lot of our defense at a time when AlQ is on the offensive.
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-09-14 16:28  

00:00