You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Election 2012
Obama''s Hopes for No Change
2012-09-10
Normally, a president presiding over 8 percent unemployment and a country that sees itself on the wrong track wouldn't stand a chance.
But the first black president (since slick Willie) deserves a second chance!
But then a candidate with Mitt Romney's shortcomings, including his failure to ignite much enthusiasm within his own party, wouldn't stand a chance, either.
Mitt also benefits from the "anybody but Obama sentiment."
The combination of the two explains why this election remains close, but President Obama heads into the campaign's last phase with some major advantages, starting, as Ronald Reagan did, with a rock solid racial base. These voters will support him no matter what the economic numbers say.
Mr. Wife's father and great uncle, loyal -- and decades retired -- steel union members living in a party machine town, will always vote, and vote Democrat.
Their commitment helps create an electoral map that also favors Obama, particularly with Ohio stubbornly retaining a tilt the president's way.

Obama also has a benefit of the doubt from many voters because they know he inherited an economic catastrophe, a point powerfully made by former President Bill Clinton in Charlotte.
And the Obama base believes the story it was sooo bad, Obama needs eight years, even though he said he could do in three.
And more voters are enthusiastic about Obama, the man, than about Romney, the man. That's why Team Romney had to spend so much time at the Tampa convention rescuing Romney's personal image. It also explains the wide energy gap between the two conclaves.
That, and the MSM toots louder than the web.
To MSM ears, anyway...
Democrats were so eager to help Obama that it seemed they were ready to cheer even the reading of a phone book or a grocery list. Tampa was flat. Charlotte was hopping.
Especially the voice vote triple-play. But even E. J. Dionne can stumble across an acorn -
The debates next month are Romney's biggest opening, and he's very disciplined in his approach to such encounters. He used them effectively to turn back primary challenges from Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. The president, on the other hand, is out of practice. And although Obama performed well in the 2008 debates against John McCain by directing almost every word he spoke to swing voters, debating has never been his strongest suit.
He just needs a sharp aide with a voice-to-text conversion program, and the TOTUS.
Indeed, some of Obama's most loyal supporters see an additional debate risk for him: The president can look arrogant and dismissive when he doesn't respect an opponent or when he feels he has the upper hand.
Then he's toast.
Obama can afford no "you're likable enough, Hillary" moments. Romney will try hard to cause or manufacture them.
Posted by:Bobby

#5  So the bottomline is that the avg American voter is so stupid that they would vote for something as shallow as candidate "like-ability" over a bias for results? If so, We are certainly screwed, and deservedly so.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2012-09-10 21:02  

#4  10 North Korea-Korean War
Viet Nam - same
Cuba- Bay Of Pigs Same
Afghanistan Russia- Same
Obama Administration-Holly Wood And Chicago 1950's to present the same ! Atheists and Communists
Famous ghoul unloading giving Gods soldiers a pep talk in Afghanistan a communist ghoul Obama's closest adviser.
DNC convention crapping on God and booing God
Anyone who has fought communism or lost friends or family or has themselves become hurt or crippled should really examine what is running OUR COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND! The War Is In Our Country and all have been made to look for the boogey man in other places!
Posted by: Angiting Snore1647   2012-09-10 19:08  

#3  How many more fake lame communist Czars until our Democracy and Country become more pathetic than Russia ever was? Does anyone have a firm count on that or a computer algorithm to answer that question or our we almost there?
Posted by: Angiting Snore1647   2012-09-10 19:07  

#2  What they have done as an advertising strategy is the sex sells approach. Look at the speakers, listen to the rhetoric and sophomoric jokes from the boosters. Branding a fellow known for sticking tobaccoo products in a woman's hoo-hoo being branded the first black James T. Kirk, ms. flukesalot' cheeky ending joke, the parade of uhem roses, biker babes for biden. The counter Ryan is sexy narrative build.

Energy gap, that is exactly what they are trying to build and cast Romney as codgy.

Independants will need to be convinced to not only watch the debates, but to resist putting on the beer goggles and that they will never live down waking up next to palosi in the morning.

The best way for the dims to keep President Josh Baskins from looking bad at the debates is to convince people not to watch them, then spin on the independants who supposedly do. Thing about such a devising campaign strategy by the dims is that there are few independants; that is most people have made up their mind. Romney does have the ability to perhaps not convert democrats, but perhaps its ok to go have a plate of waffles instead of voting.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-09-10 18:26  

#1  It amazes me to no end how much of a free pass some people are willing to give 0bama on the economy. Does any honest person really believe that if the incumbent were a Republican with the same exact economic numbers we have today, he/she wouldn't be voted out of office in a landslide?
Posted by: Eltoroverde    2012-09-10 16:25  

00:00