You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
US rejects majority of Pakistan's support fund demands
2012-06-04
[Dawn] The United States has rejected majority of the demands pressed by Pakistain with respect to the coalition support fund claiming them to be unrealistic, DawnNews reported.

The US is not only adamant in its refusal to apologise for the Salala border checkpost incident that had resulted in the killings of 24 Pak soldiers in November last year but also cornering Pakistain as punishment for the apology demand.

Sources claimed that Pakistain's federal government has decided to pass the burden of the US punishment onto the public and the price of compressed natural gas (CNG) has been increased by 15 to 20 per cent to deal with the impasse. The price hike would be affective from 1st July.

US military authorities rejected Pakistain's request seeking USD 2.8 billion in respect of the coalition support fund stating the request as 'unrealistic'.

Both the countries have held more than half a dozen meetings related to the disbursement of the support fund's amount but the issue remains unresolved in face of the rejection by the US.

Pak-US relations went into freefall last year.

There were hit when a CIA contractor rubbed out two Paks and dented further by an American raid that killed al Qaeda chief the late Osama bin Laden
... who sleeps with the fishes...
and by US air strikes in November that killed 24 Pak soldiers.

After the air strikes, Pakistain shut its Afghan border to NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A cautionary tale of cost-benefit analysis....
supplies and ordered US staff out of an air base reportedly used as a hub for drones.

Seven US drone strikes have been reported since May's Chicago summit, which failed to secure a deal on resuming the supply lines.

In March, Pakistain's parliament agreed to reset US relations on condition that Washington apologise for the troops' deaths and end drone attacks on its soil.

Pakistain has been incensed by Washington's refusal to apologise for the November air strikes and US officials have so far rejected Pak proposals to charge several thousand dollars for each alliance truck crossing the border.

Islamabad, which is understood to have given its tacit approval for attacks on al Qaeda and Taliban targets in the past, has become increasingly vocal in its opposition to the perceived violation of national illusory sovereignty.

Despite Pak criticism US officials are believed to consider the drone attacks too useful to stop them altogether. They have argued that drone strikes are a valuable weapon in the war against Islamist cut-thoats.

According to an AFP tally, 45 US missile strikes were reported in Pakistain's tribal belt in 2009, the year US President Barack Obama
Because I won...
took office, 101 in 2010 and 64 in 2011.

The New America Foundation think-tank in Washington says drone strikes have killed between 1,715 and 2,680 people in Pakistain in the past eight years.
Posted by:Fred

#1  Apparently, it has changed ....

* DEFENCE.PK.FORUMS > US AGREES TO PAY [reimburse] US$1.18BILYUHN OF CSF ARREARS, or approxi 75% of claims to Pakistan.

However, DPK POSTERS = argue that Pakistan is claiming or owed another US$1.5Bilyuhn in claims for domestically fighting MilTerrs at behest of the US-NATO inside + along the Pak-Afghan border, hence the so-called "75%" is actually only "42%" of what Pak is due from the US.

versus

* SAME > PAKISTAN [strongly] CONDEMNS [new rise = surge] IN "ILLEGAL" US DRONE STRIKES.

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > US DRONES ATTACK PAKISTAN TARGETS FOR THIRD SUCCESSIVE DAY.

* SAME > [IBN]US DRONE ATTACKS IN PAKISTAN TURNING INTO VIRTUAL BLITZ [-krieg], espec in NW Pakistan.

* SAME > PAKISTAN [now] SEEKS US$2000 TRANSIT
[US$1800.0 - 2000.0] FOR EACH NATO CONTAINER [Truck] + TANKER.

versus

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > NATO STRIKES DEAL WID CENTRAL ASIAN NATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF EQUIPMENT FROM AFGHANISTAN TO COMPLETELY BYPASS PAKISTAN.

* RELATED DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > NATO STRIKES ALTERNATE SUPPLY ROUTES DEAL THROUGH CENTRAL ASIA, namely Uzbekistan + Kyrgyzstan + Kazakhistan.

versus

* IIRC DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > IRAN: PAKISTAN, IRAN ARE "MAJOR REGIONAL POWERS".

Looks like POTUS Bammer may yet be able to avoid ground war wid IRAN going into November 2012, save for other MSM-Net News this AM as per Muslims being killed by Buddhist reactionaries oer in Myanmar, + more Shia Muslims being killed by alleged Sunnis in Quetta.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-06-04 22:01  

00:00