You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
Defense secretary visits former U.S. base in Vietnam
2012-06-03
Posted by:ryuge

#3  More ...

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > [Fox News]PANETTA URGES MORE US NAVAL ACCESS TO VIETNAM HARBOR.

POSTERS = remind that the US had major bases throughoutthe former South Vietnam of which Cam Ranh Bay is only one, e.g. Da Nang + around Saigon. PHIL, VIETNAM US BASES + RUSSIA, INDIA, JAPAN, ISLAMIC NATIONS' PRESENCE = CHINA WILL ALL ABSOLUTELY LOSE ITS CLAIMS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEAS; CHINA MUST EITHER GIVE UP ITS CLAIMS, OR ELSE WAGE WAR.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > PANETTA IS FIRST TOP US OFFICIAL SINCE WAR IN CAM RANH BAY.

* SAME > THE NEW GUAM DOCTRINE. Bammer/US-favored "Concert of Powers in Asia-Pacific".

ARTIC > denotes that for AUSTRALIA, EVERY AUS = OZ DEFENCE WHITE PAPER SINCE 1976, + prior 1969 NIXON/GUAM CONFERENCE, HAS BEEN A "POST-GUAM CONFERENCE" DOCUMENT.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > US WIL BE BACK IN CAM RANH BAY, VIETNAM.

POSTER = opined that besides all of the US Navy's conventional force assets, e.f. Surface Warships, Aircraft Carriers, + Subs, THE OTHER MAJOR US THREAT TO THE REGION + CHINA WILL BE ALL OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS THE US WILL HAVE ON USN SHIPS ANDOR STORED IN ALLIED LAND BASES IN HOST COUNTRIES.

OTHER POSTER = opined that that is clear the US INTENDS TO CLAIM THE BASES ARE ONLY FOR RR/MWR PURPOSES BUT IN REALITY WILL BE USED TO MONITOR + "AMBUSH" PLAN SHIPS MANEUVERING/OPERAT IN THE SCS IN TIMES OF CONFRONTATION OR WAR.

* SAME >[Inquirer Global Nation = Global Filipino] "GREATER NUMBER" OF US WARSHIPS TO VISIT PHILIPPINES. PHIL Foreign Secretary Albert Del Rosario.

Also from INQUIRER GLOBAL NATION > US "PIVOT" MAY STIR ASIAN SENSITIVITIES; + ...
> SINGAPORE REVIEWS [Canada] LOGISTICS FACILTY PLAN IN SUPPORT OF US SHIFT.

The Mackenzies are coming, the Mackenzies are coming!?

> CHINA WON'T BE ALLOWED TO CONQUER SCARBOROUGH SHOAL, SAYS [Philippine]MILITARY OFFICIAL.
> "WE DON'T WANT ANOTHER COLD WAR IN ASIA".
Ex-PHIL Speaker Albert Venecia.

* CHINESE MIL FORUM > MANCHURIAN INDEPENDENCE GROUP SETS UP IN FACEBOOK.

* DAILY TIMES.PK > CHINA SAYS TO STEP VIGILANCE [but NOT Hard = Mil Retaliate] AFTER US NAVY SHIFT.

* TOPIX > [English Dong-A] SOUTH KOREA SHOULD GET NUCLEAR WEAPONS: REP. CHUNG.

* SAME > [News Kerala] IS TO IMPROVE TIES WID CHINA WHILE "REBALANCING" TOWARDS ASIA-PACIFIC.

* SAME > PANETTA: US OPEN TO DEFENCE TIES WID MYANMAR.

versus

* SAME > NO US BASE IN CHITTAGONG.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-06-03 23:07  

#2  Looks like a US showdown wid China is looming SOONER THAN LATER ...

To wit,

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > VIETNAM FRUSTRATED AS INDIA CHICKENS OUT |[Deccan Herald = Indjuh] BEATING A RETREAT.

Failed bilateral/joint Indo-Viet energy venture that has larger strategic = MilPol implications for Vietnam as per the disputed SCS???

* WORLD MIL FORUM > YIN ZHAO: US BUILDUP OF BASES IN ASIA-PACIFIC INCREASES LIKELIHOOD THAT CHINA WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN WAR.

* SAME > JAPANESE MEDIA > CHINESE SHIPS [PLAN] HAVE NEVER NETURED THIS FAR/DEEP INTO THE PACIFIC [700-kms east of Okinotori Reef-Atoll close to waters of the US CNMI].

* SAME > EXPERTS: SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES CAUSING CHINA TO STEADILY ALTER PLA'S STRATEGIC WAR DOCTRINE + US-CHINA-WAR SCENARIO OER TAIWAN FROM "ACTIVE DEFENSE" TO "DEEP OFFENSIVE/
STRIKE". TAIWAN WAR SCENARIO TO CHANGE INTO FULL-SCALE AIR, SEA, SPACE BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF THE OKINAWA-TAIWAN-PHILIPPINE TRIANGLE ["Dragon Triangle"]. NEW DOCTRINE ENVISIONS OFFENSIVE CHINA BLITZ AGZ TAIWAN PHILIPPINES, + EAST-SOUTH CHINA SEA ISLANDS. PREEMPTIVE OR FIRST-STRIKE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO SINK THE US NUCLEAR CARRIER + AGZ JAPAN.

HHHHMMM, HMMMMM, wehell, IIRC from the History Channel time back, the so-called "Dragon Triangle" [Asia's "Bermuda Triangle"] stemmed from Okinawa to PHIL to Guam-CNMI???

* TOPIX > [PHIL Star] > PHILIPPINE NAVY NEEDS P$5000BILYUHN TO UPGRADE War CAPABILITIES.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > [Japan Times] ISHIHARA [intentionally?]RATTLES US SABRE AGZ CHINA.

ARTIC > ISHIHARA = claims that JAPAN IS WEAK IN NEARLY EVERY FIELD, INCLUDING THE ECON + DEFENSE.

* SAME > CHINA'S EXPANDING CORE ["Core/Strategic Interests"] IS WORRYING ITS ASIAN NEIGHBORS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-06-03 19:57  

#1  From eternity, 58.267 brave men and women ask why?

Feckless, trouble making politicians, I despise them all!
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-06-03 08:00  

00:00