You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
ObamaÂ’s signal to Iran
2012-04-07
President Obama has signaled Iran that the United States would accept an Iranian civilian nuclear program if Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei can back up his recent public claim that his nation “will never pursue nuclear weapons.”

This verbal message was sent through Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who visited Khamenei last week. A few days before traveling to Iran, Erdogan had held a two-hour meeting with Obama in Seoul, in which they discussed what Erdogan would tell the ayatollah about the nuclear issue and Syria.
And how much 'flexibility' Obama would have after the next election...
Obama advised Erdogan that the Iranians should realize that time is running out for a peaceful settlement and that Tehran should take advantage of the current window for negotiations. Obama didnÂ’t specify whether Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium domestically as part of the civilian program the United States would endorse. That delicate issue evidently would be left for the negotiations that are supposed to start April 13, at a venue yet to be decided.

Erdogan is said to have replied that he would convey ObamaÂ’s views to Khamenei, and itÂ’s believed he did so when he met the Iranian leader on Thursday. Erdogan also met President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other senior Iranian officials during his visit.

The statement highlighted by Obama as a potential starting point was made on state television in February. Khamenei said: “The Iranian nation has never pursued and will never pursue nuclear weapons. . . . Iran is not after nuclear weapons because the Islamic Republic, logically, religiously and theoretically, considers the possession of nuclear weapons a grave sin and believes the proliferation of such weapons is senseless, destructive and dangerous.”

The challenge for negotiators is whether itÂ’s possible to turn KhameneiÂ’s public rhetoric into a serious and verifiable commitment not to build a bomb. When Obama cited this statement to Erdogan as something to build on, the Turkish leader is said to have nodded in agreement.

But the diplomatic path still seems blocked, judging by recent haggling over the meeting place for negotiations. Istanbul was expected to be the venue, but the Iranians last weekend balked and suggested instead that negotiators meet in Iraq or China. U.S. officials see this foot-dragging as a sign that the Iranian leadership is still struggling to frame its negotiating position.

The Erdogan back channel to Iran is the most dramatic evidence yet of the close relationship Obama has forged with the Turkish leader. Erdogan, who heads an Islamist party that is often cited as a model by Muslim democrats, has been a key U.S. partner in handling Syria and other crises flowing from the Arab Spring uprisings.
And Champ likes the way Erdogan treats his wife...
A sign of ErdoganÂ’s role as intermediary is that he was accompanied, both in the meeting with Obama and on the trip to Iran, by Hakan Fidan, the chief of TurkeyÂ’s intelligence service. Fidan is said to have close relations with Qassem Suleimani, who heads IranÂ’s Quds Force and is probably KhameneiÂ’s closest adviser on security issues. Also joining Erdogan was Ahmet Davutoglu, the Turkish foreign minister.

Syria was another big topic in ErdoganÂ’s discussions with Obama and his subsequent visit to Iran. The Turkish leader told Obama he would press Iran to reduce its support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom Erdogan once championed but is now determined to oust. Erdogan said he planned to tell Khamenei that Syrian attacks on Muslim opposition forces must stop. The Turks have been trying, meanwhile, to bolster the opposition so that it can provide a credible alternative to AssadÂ’s rule.

Some Arab analysts see a weakening of support for Assad in recent days from Iran and its Lebanese proxy, Hezbollah, whose leader Hasan Nasrallah last week called for a “political solution” with the opposition. The key player in any such managed transition would be Russia’s president-elect, Vladimir Putin. U.S. officials hope he can broker a Syria deal before he meets Obama at the G-8 summit next month.

As IranÂ’s leadership debates its negotiating stance, the squeeze of Western sanctions is becoming tighter. Nat Kern, the editor of Foreign Reports, a leading oil newsletter, forecasts that Iran will lose about a third of its oil exports by mid-summer. It may get even worse for Iran after July 1 if China and the European Union follow through on recent warnings that they might stop insuring tankers carrying Iranian crude.

U.S. officials believe that if Iran refuses to negotiate, it will be easier to tighten sanctions even more.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  More from DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > NUCLEAR IRAN WILL DESTABILIZE WEST ASIA, IS NOT IN INDIA'S INTERESTS: ISRAELI EXPERTS.

and

* SAME > [Iranian Lawmaker] IRAN CAN PRODUCE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, BUT WILL NOT. View does not represent that of the Iranian Govt.

As per my earlier POsts, methinks France + HIllary want something more substantive as proof.

FYI DPK POSTER = opined that IHO, given the state of Iranian proficiency in various Sciences including NUclear, IT SHOULD ONLY TAKE IRAN 1-2 MONTHS ONLY TO BUILD A RELIABLE NUCBOMB.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-04-07 22:24  

#8  The Bammer a'sezzes ITS IRAN'S "LAST CHANCE".

The DemoLeft + MSM is pushing H-A-R-D that "things are getting better in America" this 2012 thanx to the Bammer + Dems, + that the Bammer WILL EASILY WIN RE-ELECTION IN NOVEMBER???

As per DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > FRANCE: IRAN MUST BOW, i.e Iran must PROVE ITS CIVIE NUC ENERGY- ONLY INTENTIONS TO THE G5 + 1, HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN SINCE A SOVEREIGN NATION WILLFULLY DID SUCH A THING???

[POST-WW1 TREATY OF VERSAILLES GERMANY here].

And Yeeuuuppp, wid a threat of WORLDWIDE/GLOBAL ECON DEPRESSION too.

I'l believe it when I see it.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-04-07 21:58  

#7  This must be that Smahrt Diplomacy we have heard soo much about.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-04-07 15:47  

#6  To summarize, president Obama isn't even bothering to pretend he's not measuring Israel's back for knife placement. That was another one sliding in.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-04-07 12:51  

#5  Its all moot. Israel has said if Iran keeps attacking jews, Israel will retaliate against Iran.

I expect to see IRG offices and barracks mysteriously exploding in the not to distant future.

It will escalate from there, but Israel has drawn a line in the sand and they don't usually back down when it is the lives of their citizens and jews in general at stake.

With Syria and Egypt in chaos, the time is now to face down Iran.
Posted by: phil_b   2012-04-07 09:52  

#4  The challenge for negotiators is whether it's possible to turn Khamenei's public rhetoric into a serious and verifiable commitment not to build a bomb.

Ignatius makes a cogent argument for the “something’s got to give” strategy. Unfortunately, there are no guaranties that the foundations for such an argument would be effective with the Persian Turbans. In fact, history suggests the West’s feeble attempt at external pressure has been, at best, counter-intuitive. And, at worst, this decades long fiddle is playing precisely into the hands of Tehran’s’ obvious “play out the clock” strategy. The starting point must be that Team Khamenei has rarely acted in Western concepts of rationality. And then there’s the fact that the Mullahs have developed lying and deceit into an Art form.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2012-04-07 09:52  

#3  Obama seeking substantiation? Sheriff Joe will be snorting Blue Mountain through his nose when he reads this.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-04-07 03:48  

#2  The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques couldn't be reached for comment.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-04-07 03:25  

#1  Let me correct my earlier Post from today - Israel + other anti-Iran Sunni Muslim Govts-States to go ballistic.

04/07/2012 - the Day the ME Nuclear Arms Race officially began, to include the so-called "Islamist/Jihadi Bomb", + wid US assent???

DITTO ANY GOP-DEM WRANGLING IN WASHINGTON OER THE NEED FOR MISSLE DEFENSE, GLOBALSTRIKE + SPACE STRIKE; + GLOBAL DEFENSE + SPACE DEFENSE.

More Space-based Lasers, etc. to be test-fired [again]to near that Madonna Fan from Guam.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-04-07 00:31  

00:00