You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Cameron: No justification for Israeli attack on Iran right now
2012-03-16
Posted by:ryuge

#13  Meanwhile, not to be outdone by Iran + Argie Prez Christina oer dat Falklands brouhaha ...

* CHINA DAILY FORUM > "ENGLAND CAN BOMB SCOTTISH AIRPORTS, e.g. Glasgow + Edinborough, iff ole' Escosse' became formally independent from the UK, became mil undefended, but fell under "enemy/hostile" influence.


Tory Peer + Former Solicitor-General of Scotland LORD FRASER.

SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY [SNP]SCHEMA TO REMOVE ALL UK NUCLEAR FORCES FROM SCOTLAND + CONVERT THE COUNTRY'S NAVY INTO "FISHERY PROTECTION" VESSELS RISKS TURNING SCOTLAND INTO AN INDEFENSIBLE WARZONE.

Not sure iff His Lordship si referring to the IRISH OR TO RADICAL ISLAM'S GLOBAL = EURO JIHAD???

D *** NG IT, THE IRISH ARE COMING, THE IRISH ARE COMING!

[MONTY PYTHON'S GIANT RABBIT vs "THE EAGLE" vs BENNY HILL'S MIGHTY EU DUSCH ARMY here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-03-16 22:50  

#12  "KAMARAD"? CAMERON + IRAN ...

versus

* CHINA DAILY FORUM > BRITISH PM IMPLIES AGHAN MISSION HAS FAILED | "WE WON'T BUILD A PERFECT AFGHANISTAN".

The USA, be it under the Bammer or other POTUS, will still have DEEP TROUBLES wid Afghanistan after 2014 pullout.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-03-16 22:34  

#11  I never understood the concept of justification ?
Posted by: Water Modem   2012-03-16 19:49  

#10  When Tel Aviv disappears under a mushroom cloud, Obama and Cameron will go to the UN and demand that they send a VERY strongly worded memo of disapproval. And tell Iran that if they do it again we will ... send another REALLY strongly worded memo, backed by a Security Council resolution condemning the action. Of course, Russia and China will probably veto the resolution.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2012-03-16 18:02  

#9  But David, we're going to do it because nuclear is polluting!
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-03-16 15:48  

#8  There are a number of folk on the left that would still say an Israeli counter-attack would be unwarranted because such an attack wouldn't bring the dead back.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-03-16 15:34  

#7  Ask them how many dead Jews does it take to justify defending themselves? A million? 50 million? all of them?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-03-16 15:23  

#6  Yeah, it would be better if the Israelis waited until *after* Iran tries to destroy Israel, just to make sure the Iranians mean all that Final Solution stuff.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-03-16 14:40  

#5  Pretty much what you would expect from a former PR exec.
Posted by: Peter Carroll   2012-03-16 13:57  

#4  Shut up you MORON.
Posted by: newc   2012-03-16 12:34  

#3  I would like the Israelis to say to Camoron and the Obamanation........"OK exactly what do you think WOULD justify an attack?"

And then make them be specific. Would certainly let everyone know where they stood, wouldn't it?
Posted by: AlanC   2012-03-16 11:14  

#2  You rather wonder what Champ said to Dave at the basketball game...
Posted by: Steve White   2012-03-16 10:39  

#1  "Peace in our time."

From the leader of a country that tends to prosecute anyone that defends themselves this really shouldn't surprise me yet it does.
Posted by: Rjschwarz   2012-03-16 10:01  

00:00