You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
IAEA to explain 'failed' Iran mission
2012-02-24
UN atomic agency chief Yukiya Amano is expected to outline in a report Friday why its team investigating Iran's suspected nuclear weapons drive returned empty handed this week, diplomats said, AFP reported.
What's to explain?
IAEA chief inspector Herman Nackaerts and his team returned from Tehran on Wednesday with no progress in their search for answers from Iran on its alleged bid to develop nuclear weapons, leading Washington to brand the trip a "failure."

Diplomats in Vienna said they have begun discussing what action the 35-member IAEA board will take when it holds its next regular meeting on March 5. In theory
...in theory there's no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is...
it could pass a resolution condemning Iran and reporting the Islamic republic to the UN Security Council, which has already passed four rounds of sanctions.
And, as I recall, a sternly worded letter...
This though depends on Russia and China, which have hitherto been more lenient on Iran that their Western counterparts in the UN Security Council.
Which is to say that it will all go nowhere.
Diplomats also say that the International Atomic Energy Agency report will give an update on Iran's progress in fitting out its new facility at Fordo, near Qom, enriching uranium to 20-percent purity. The facility, under a mountain and kept secret by Iran until late 2009, would slash the time needed to convert Iran's stockpile of low-enriched uranium to the 90-percent purity needed for a nuclear bomb if it decided to do so, experts say.

How quickly Iran could enrich would also depend on what kind of centrifuges are installed at Fordo. Indications so far are that Iran is installing "IR-1" older-generation devices, diplomats said, which could be converted to enrich to 90 percent, but which would do the work more slowly than more state-of-the-art models.

One Western diplomat said he expected the IAEA to say that Iran had installed "high hundreds" of centrifuges at Fordo -- but not the "thousands" that have been speculated -- and of the older kind.

"The newer-generation centrifuges that they have been working on have all been at Natanz," Iran's main enrichment site, another diplomat told AFP. "They are fewer in number, have been problematic, and we haven't heard from the IAEA that they have moved anything to Fordo."
Posted by:Steve White

#4  I give them major props for actually finding something; in this case, Iran.

which is why I always click on a SteveS comment.
Posted by: Frank G   2012-02-24 22:46  

#3  The IAEA has come a long way since the days of Hans Blix. I give them major props for actually finding something; in this case, Iran.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-02-24 21:08  

#2  "so long and thanks for all the fish"
Posted by: Frank G   2012-02-24 20:48  

#1  "They kept throwing streamers and glitter up into the air and promising us ponies and stuff. We were soooo distracted."
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2012-02-24 10:53  

00:00