You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Feel-Good story of the day: New York Times loses $40million in 2011
2012-02-03
The New York Times Company suffered a net loss of almost $40million in 2011, with its fourth quarter profits falling by 12.2 per cent compared to the same period in 2010.

The company is grappling with sinking advertising revenue and a recent change in the top management after losing CEO Janet Robinson, who received a multimillion dollar severance package.
She wasn't lost, she was fired. There's a difference...
They said it continued to add subscribers for its digital products in the fourth quarter.
Surely most of them were RBers who felt bad for them.
The company's loss was blamed on the terminal decline in print advertising. The problems plaguing newspaper companies are well known.
Terminal. Good adjective.
Readers have ditched print for digital, causing circulation and advertising revenue to plummet.

The company, which rolled out an online pay system last year for digital subscribers, said paid digital subscribers of The Times and the International Herald Tribune rose 20 per cent from the third quarter to about 390,000. The digital subscription strategy helped circulation revenue to grow five per cent to $241.6 million in the fourth quarter.

Chief Financial Officer James Follo said: 'We are confident that our plan to sustain momentum through the rollout of a series of new features, functions and content will enable us to steadily build our digital progress to date.'
Captain Smith was confident that his ship couldn't be sunk...
The Times Company is also planning on selling more of its stake in the Boston Red Sox.
Because they are planning on being so successful, no doubt.
They confirmed today they agreed to sell an additional part of its stake in Fenway Sports Group for $30 million, pending the approval of Major League Baseball. Last July the company sold more than half its stake to three separate buyers for $117 million.

The Times Company also announced in December that it had agreed to sell its regional newspapers for $143 million to Halifax Media Holdings. This sale is not reflected in the 2011 figures.

The company expects total advertising revenue trends in the first quarter to be similar to the fourth-quarter levels, and total circulation revenue to increase in the high-single digits.
But they've been going down, so why would you expect them to increase...
Shares of the company, which have gained more than 30 percent in value in the last three months, were flat at $7.64 on Thursday afternoon on the New York Stock Exchange.
Posted by:gorb

#8  Manolo! Notify my crack whores! Tell them daddy needs loving!
Posted by: Pinchy   2012-02-03 21:50  

#7  Where did the Mexican go?
Posted by: manversgwtw   2012-02-03 21:24  

#6  Multi-milllion dollar losses will lead to multi-million dollar GIvernment bailout. After all how could an America survive without the NY Times.
Posted by: Airandee   2012-02-03 18:14  

#5  Is there any way for people such as myself to hasten this hopefully-terminal decline?

I kinda like the slow, agonizing thing myself. They deserve it.
Posted by: gorb   2012-02-03 15:43  

#4  til Pinch is turning tricks for cognac money, I'm not satisfied. Perhaps the ChiComs could buy them out and make Friedman CEO (he would do their bidding without having to be asked) and Teh Krugman CFO
Posted by: Frank G   2012-02-03 14:45  

#3  Is there any way for people such as myself to hasten this hopefully-terminal decline?

I know, it's not nice thinking.
Posted by: Free Radical   2012-02-03 12:51  

#2  ...of course this never precludes bonuses for the one percent senior management.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-02-03 09:54  

#1  Awwww, my heart just aches.

No, wait - that's just the chili.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-02-03 09:28  

00:00