You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Pyongyang Demands Answers from Seoul
2012-02-03
Pyongyang on Thursday issued an "open questionnaire" that demands answers from Seoul if relations between the two Koreas are to improve.
It's not an eHarmony style questionnaire...
The official KCNA news agency said that the questionnaire came from the policy department of the National Defense Commission, which "solemnly urges" South Korea to answer it "since it loudly trumpets a resumption of inter-Korean dialogue and improvement of relations."
Intra-Korean, surely.
The department is also known as the General Reconnaissance Bureau, the headquarters of the regime's anti-South Korean operations, led by Kim Yong-chol.

The questionnaire consists of nine questions. It asks whether Seoul can "feel deeply sorry and be determined to apologize" for having banned all but a handful of South Koreans from paying their respects after Kim Jong-il's death;
Can, yes. Does? Absolutely not, obviously. A poor start by the questioner. Let us go on.
whether it is willing to "officially express its intention at home and abroad to implement the joint declarations" adopted after the first and second inter-Korean summits in 2000 and 2007;
Were it willing, it would have done so in, say, 2001 or 2008. A pointless question.
and whether it will "declare to the world" that it no longer blames the North for the sinking of the Navy corvette Cheonan and the shelling of Yeonpyeong Island in 2010.
There is going to be a mighty short response from the South...
Which is worse, from the North Korean perspective: a quietly raised eyebrow or ill-concealed snickers?
It also demands Seoul suspend large-scale military exercises, suspend anti-North Korean propaganda campaigns, resume inter-Korean exchanges, and abolish the National Security Law.
Snickers it is, then.
"It's a pity that the North issued such an absurd statement for propaganda purposes," a Unification Ministry official said. "We don't think it necessary for the government to respond to each question."
Or to any of them...
Oooo. Ladies and gentlemen, let us pause to admire a perfectly executed sniquere diplomatique.
Prof. Kim Yong-hyun of Dongguk University said the questionnaire bodes ill for inter-Korean relations. "Although the questionnaire looks as if the regime is urging Seoul to change its policy toward the North, it in fact made clear that it has no intention to improve relations with the Lee Myung-bak administration," he said.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  I would have opted for the food spitting out, milk out the nose laughter, likely why I avoided diplomacy.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-02-03 17:30  

#9  Will North Korean allow for the free exibition of the film Team America, the only film to show the true nature of King Jung Ill.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-02-03 14:46  

#8  What government genius signed off on "Unification Ministry?"

My first and second thoughts were: "The Moonies? Huh, they said something intelligent for a change."
Posted by: Gabby Cussworth, Man of a Thousand Nyms   2012-02-03 14:38  

#7  Prof. Kim Yong-hyun of Dongguk University said the questionnaire bodes ill for inter-Korean relations

That's why he's a Professor.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-02-03 13:43  

#6  I liked the recent Minne Mouse/Burka photo, it covers all but the eyes, and illustrates the idiocy better.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2012-02-03 11:50  

#5  Some comedian in the South should respond with his own list of questions:

1) If starving North Koreans chopped up and ate fat boy, how many people would he feed?

2) If North Korea asked humbly, do you think that China would let them become a colony of slaves?

3) Does the North Korean people think it's time to change their form of government to one that isn't pure evil?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2012-02-03 09:59  

#4  42
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-02-03 08:51  

#3  MOre from WORLD MIL FORUM > [Global Times = Prof. Liang Feng]NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY EXPERT: PROPOSED RELOCATION OF 3000 US MARINES FROM OKINAWA [original = 8000 Marines] TO HAWAII [Third Island chain] WEAKENS US ISOLATION/CONTAINMENT OF CHINA, HELPS CHINA EXPAND IT SCOPE OF CONTROL INTO WESTERN PACIFIC. US WILLING TO GIVE CHINA ONE-HALF OF PACIFIC OCEAN?

IIUC, the Professor sees it as de facto GEOPOL = STRATEGIC RETREAT by the US in favor of China, Eventual Chinese takeover of GUAM-WESTPAC inferred by US fallback to Hawaii???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-02-03 01:31  

#2  And once again, the charming and delicately written phrasology of TW echoes through the hallowed halls of Rantburg U.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2012-02-03 00:55  

#1  ION NOT-COREA/CORYE, WORLD MIL FORUM > [OpEd]CHINA SHOULD DECLARE OKINAWA + DAOYUS [Senkakus = Japan] AS SOVEREIGN OR SUBSIDIARY TO CHINA IFF JAPAN DECLARES SAME AS PER DAOYUS, NANSHAS + OTHER DISPUTED ISLANDS.

* SAME > US ALLY PHILIPPINES IS THE WEAKEST LINK IN THE FIRST ISLAND CHAIN WHICH CHINA CAN EASILY BREAKTHROUGH/OVERWHELM.

* SAME > FORMER USDOD OFFCIAL SAYS JSDF FORCES SHOULD BE STATIONED ON GUAM ISLAND ALONGSIDE THE US MILITARY. Assistant SecDef Gregson.

* WAFF > [StrategyPage] CHINA INVADES JAPAN. Rise in PLAAF incursions vee JSDAF.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-02-03 00:55  

00:00