You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US: no comment on 'buzz' of Israeli strike on Iran
2011-11-03
[Dawn] The United States declined Wednesday to respond to "buzz" or "rumors" in Israel about reports Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was seeking cabinet support for a strike on Iran.

The White House said it was focused squarely on a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear drive, and said that Iran's diminutive President Mahmoud Short Round Ahmadinejad had recently expressed discomfort about the impact of Iranian sanctions.

White House front man Jay Carney said that he would not comment on "buzz, rumors, decisions that may or may not have been made, debates that may or may not have been had.""I'm not going to respond to that kind of speculation."Carney was asked to comment after a report in Haaretz newspaper on Wednesday cited a senior Israeli official as saying Netanyahu was working with Defense Minister Ehud Barak to win support from skeptical members of the cabinet who oppose attacking Iranian nuclear facilities.

The report followed days of renewed public discussion among Israeli commentators about the possibility that the Jewish state would take unilateral military action against Iran.

Carney said that the Obama White House was "very focused" on the threat from Iran and the need for Tehran to uphold its international obligations on its nuclear program.

"I believe the president of Iran himself recently conceded that ... sanctions are having dramatic negative impact on their economy." "We remain focused on a diplomatic channel here, a diplomatic course in terms of dealing with Iran."
Posted by:Fred

#8  I would like to talk about it.
I would love to talk about it
but I can't talk about it.
Posted by: Dale   2011-11-03 21:29  

#7  Word, AH.
Posted by: Barbara   2011-11-03 18:11  

#6  Hope he's not doing this just to boost his chances of getting re-elected. EVERYTHING he's doing is to boost his chances of re-election.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-11-03 16:09  

#5  Guardian article: "President Obama has a big decision to make in the coming months because he won't want to do anything just before an election."
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-03 15:46  

#4  One of these articles said nothing would happen until after the 2012 election. However, BO might consider supporting such a strike if he thought it would give him a bounce about election time.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-03 15:43  

#3  ALL EYES ON POTUS BAMMER GOING INTO THE 2012 RE-ELECTION SEASON.

Hope he's not doing this just to boost his chances of getting re-elected. Not sure I trust Obummer with this type of action even though I do believe it's long overdue. I would have felt better if Bush had done it a long, long time ago.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-11-03 12:02  

#2  Groovy!
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-11-03 11:19  

#1  Many Analysts are conceding the point that, short of Major War or de facto revolutionary "Regime Change", Iran will likely succeed in going Nuclear 2012 NLT 2015, to include dev of NucWeaps.

As Iran is repor relocating many of its key NucProg activities underground = hardened facilities, IDAF air strike(s) alone may not be enough even under US-style? sustained bombing campaign.

* WORLD, MIL HISTORY = TO DEFEAT THE PERSIANS [Iranians], ONE HAS TO INVADE + CONQUER PERSIA [Iran] PROPER.

ALL EYES ON POTUS BAMMER GOING INTO THE 2012 RE-ELECTION SEASON.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-03 02:25  

00:00