You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Marshall Plan-type economic support for Pakistan urged
2011-05-28
[Pak Daily Times] The United States should pursue a Marshall Plan on the lines of its assistance for European allies after World War II to help bolster Pakistain's economy as key part of the effort to defeat terrorism in the long-term perspective, a senior adviser to President Asif Ali President Ten Percent Zardari
... sticky-fingered husband of the late Benazir Bhutto ...
advocated on Friday.

MNA Farahnaz Ispahani underscored in an opinion piece in The USA Today that Pakistain is a major victim of terrorism and bringing better economic opportunities to its people can only guarantee enduring success in the two countries' common struggle against terror threat.

"The US, after the second World War, understood that political stability in vulnerable countries like La Belle France, Italia and Greece was intrinsically linked to the viability of their economies. Former president Truman advanced the European Recovery Plan (the Marshall Plan) that brilliantly operationalised this thesis, and by doing so saved Western Europe from communism, she recalled.

The same construct should be applied to Pakistain as we jointly work towards the eradication of terrorism and the rebuilding of a peaceful and stable South and Central Asia."

Ispahani, who is media adviser to President Zardari, regretted that Pakistain is projected by many in the international news media and by some in the US Congress as a purveyor of terrorism but noted that "in cold fact, it remains its chief victim".

"Three thousand Pak troops have been killed (more than all NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
losses in Afghanistan combined). Add to that 2,000 police cut down, the tragedy of 35,000 civilian casualties and the liquidation by beturbanned goons of our country's most popular leader, Benazir Bhutto, and one might understand Pak exasperation. This recent al Qaeda attack on a Pak naval base in Bloody Karachi, killing 10 of our sailors, again demonstrates that Pakistain is the principal target of terrorist rage."

Just as many Americans are expressing frustration with what they see as Pakistain's slow progress in defeating terrorism (most recently underscored by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as the Smartest Woman in the World and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Walter Q. Gresham ...
's visit to Islamabad), Paks are equally frustrated with the increasingly ugly anti-Pakistain sentiment in the United States, she wrote.

"Most Paks simply do not understand how cutting US economic and military aid to Pakistain advances the fight against terrorism," the member of the National Assembly said.

"How much of our people's blood does it take for Washington to get it?" she said.

British Prime Minister David Cameron
... has stated that he is certainly a big Thatcher fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite, which means he's not. Since he is not deeply ideological he lacks core principles and is easily led. He has been described as certainly not a Pitt, Elder or Younger, but he does wear a nice suit so maybe he's Beau Brummel ...
said it most succinctly standing next to President B.O. in London earlier this week: "Pakistain has suffered more from terrorism than any country in the world. Their enemy is our enemy. So, far from walking away, we've got to work even more closely with them."

The MNA also drew attention to the slow pace of aid flow under Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act for economic development, health, education, energy and infrastructure, pointing out that only $179 million, according to Senator Dick Lugar, R-Ind., has actually been spent.

"The rest sadly has been bottled up in a bureaucratic quagmire within USAID."
Posted by:Fred

#4  I seem to remember there was something important that preceded the post-WWII Marshal Plan. What was it, now?

Oh, yes - the TOTAL DEFEAT AND DEMORALIZATION OF THE NATION THAT STARTED THE WAR IN THE FIRST PLACE. And killing lots of their soldiers.

Until we do that to Pakistain (and Afghanistan, the Talibunnies on both sides of the border, Iran, etc.), no "Marshal Plan" is going to work.

And quit giving these clowns who are stuck in the 7th Century by choice any of my money.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-05-28 20:08  

#3  There was a lot of physical prep work which lead to the successful implementation, is he suggesting that part as well; try to re-create the plan as accurately as possible and all that.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-05-28 17:54  

#2  How much money can you dump into a swamp of corruption before people realize that you are throwing money away? Since Pakistan was never properly industrialized a "Marshall Plan" cannot work. LEvel the Madrases and build proper schools and you still have to wait a generation or two (if the educated survive) before anything can happen. You cannot lift a nation from the third world by dumping money on it. Its about mindest and culture, not about busted infrastructure.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2011-05-28 10:57  

#1  Uh, uh, Debt-ridden, Net so-called "CALIPHORNIA" going Global???

Compare wid WORLD NEWS > WHY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE IS A US$6.0TRILYUHN OPPORTUNITY.

Because in this Age of "Globalism",
"Regionalism", + OWG-NWO, etc. the focii of the US AFL-CIO is to stay Local-Nationalist.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-05-28 01:23  

00:00