| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Sen. Scott Brown to Afghanistan for his Nat'l Guard training |
| 2011-05-03 |
| BOSTON -- U.S. Sen. Scott Brown (R -MA) is heading to Afghanistan for his annual training as a JAG with the Massachusetts Army National Guard. Brown, who serves as a lieutenant colonel, says he requested to conduct his training overseas in keeping with the tradition of other lawmakers. Brown serves on the Senate Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs committees. |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #6 Precedent is Graham of SC took a leave of absence from the Senate technically vacating his seat for the time he was active duty. |
| Posted by: The Other Beldar 2011-05-03 15:37 |
| #5 As the say, follow the money. While on active duty in Afghanistan he will be on DoD's payroll, not Massachusetts. It won't even be 'laundered' through the state. Common term used is 'federalized' for duty, particularly in an overseas assignment. He will be in an office - commissioned officer. Had he done his duty in state, or through compact agreement with another state [disaster relief, joint training, etc], and the pay coming from Boston, then it wouldn't be a issue. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-05-03 13:46 |
| #4 Proco - would military activation qualify as 'appointment' for Constitutional purposes? And would military office qualify as 'civil Office?' It's not clear to me (but IANAL) that there is any Constitutional problem with Sen. Brown's plan. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2011-05-03 11:34 |
| #3 Parachutes, riggers, lawyers.....? Brings some interesting concepts to mind. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2011-05-03 08:52 |
| #2 ..don't get me wrong. I support the old Roman practice of sending senators out with the 'legions'. It's great quality assurance in making sure the troops get the training and equipment they need, since the senators' butts are on the line as well. It's sort of like making parachute packers randomly pull one of their products and having to jump with it. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-05-03 08:49 |
| #1 That little problem with the Constitution. No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. - Art I, Section 6 To go to Afghanistan he would have to be 'activated' by federal authority and as such would hold a second federal office with the commission of LTC. Of course in a 'living breathing' interpretation, he could, but by strict constructionist/originalism interpretation, no. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2011-05-03 08:46 |