You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
UK at risk of new Lockerbie
2011-03-27
Kenneth Clarke has ratcheted up government pressure to depose Colonel Gaddafi by warning that the Libyan leader could stage a Lockerbie-style attack in revenge for Britain's role in the enforcement of the UN resolution if he is left in power.

The lord chancellor told the Guardian: "We do have one particular interest in the Maghreb [the western region of North Africa], which is Lockerbie. The British people have reason to remember the curse of Gaddafi – Gaddafi back in power, the old Gaddafi looking for revenge, we have a real interest in preventing that."

Clarke says in the interview that the UN resolution does not support regime change, adding that he would regard occupation as madness. But his remarks suggest British ministers recognise they now have a direct security interest in Gaddafi's removal in light of Libya's involvement in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing which killed 259 people on Pan Am flight 103 and 11 on the ground in the Scottish town.
Yup, and Qadaffy would do it again, multiple times, just to get his revenge.
The justice secretary is also extremely frank in admitting that the UK government has little idea how long the conflict will take or how it will be resolved.

His remarks came as a Guardian ICM poll shows more people oppose British involvement in the military action in Libya than support it: 42% against, compared with 36% in favour. Asked about the purpose of British involvement, 80% support protecting civilians from attack by Gaddafi and 42% said the intervention should help Libyan rebels depose Gaddafi.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  See also TOPIX > UK POLICE FEAR ANTI-MONARCHY ANARCHISTS PLANNING TO INFILTRATE ROYAL WEDDING.

IMO Artic read, SUDDEN "DECAPITATION" TERR STRIKE AGZ MAJOR MEMBERS OR ENTIRE ROYAL FAMILY WILL OCCUR IN TIME.

Its coming - NOT "IFF" BUT "WHEN".

As Radical Islam's jihad is, after all, GLOBAL = "UNIVERSAL" IN ITS TRUE SCOPE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-03-27 23:33  

#6  From what I heard, Gadaffi has already sent money and murkymooks to conduct attacks against the UK and US in retaliation for the interference in his rule. Getting good HUMNIT on that could allow for a simple operation on him.
Posted by: newc   2011-03-27 21:41  

#5  Death has shown remarkable success in deterring repeat offenses.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-03-27 18:32  

#4  think Diplomatic Mail/Packages. They can't be searched. Who knows what could be in them?

/of course that only applies to nice guys like us and Britain. The Paks have recently demonstrated they don't respect Diplo status
Posted by: Frank G   2011-03-27 15:13  

#3  While Al-Qaeda has sponsors within nation states, it cannot regularly draw on state-level intelligence, weaponry and finances. The difference does matter.
Posted by: lotp   2011-03-27 14:37  

#2  From a crotchety perspective, no diff. Come on, you conservative wingnuts think positively! One World! One Mind! Hope and keep the change!!
Posted by: Fi   2011-03-27 13:32  

#1  Well, al-qaeda is trying to do just that everyday, so what's the diff from a security point of view?
Posted by: Jack Salami   2011-03-27 11:16  

00:00