You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Boxcutters sneaked aboard airliner at JFK
2011-03-02
The two TSA agents and supervisor who completely missed the blades at a security checkpoint "will all be disciplined and undergo remedial training," said spokeswoman Ann Davis.

Eusebio D. Peraltalajara, 45, of Jersey City waltzed past the screeners on his way to a Dominican Republic-bound flight, the sources said.

Once aboard Santiago-bound Flight 837, flight attendant Fausto Penaloda, 40, asked him to stow his luggage in the overhead storage bin.

As Peraltalajara's shoved it into the compartment, Penaloda saw the boxcutters fall out of the bag, according to a police report.
And then the fight began, as the joke goes.

More proof that we don't need the TSA. This kind of thing only gets reported if they are caught.

And I know darned well that the line will show up "they were sleeping at their posts", and I know just as well that they were proably wide awake, happy to be doing a job that doesn't need to be done, and keeping their mouths shut about the whole fiasco as long as the paychecks keep rolling in.

I know darned well that some higher-ups are going to get all fussy about the fact that the public has been reminded once again that we don't need the TSA, but is happy to make a big hooplah about how they are going to be retrained and give No-Doz and that the "problem" will go away, and all will go back to normal, with everyone's paychecks rolling in, and that those even higher up will continue to have their cash cow to milk for votes and graft.
Posted by:gorb

#5  I'm not belittling what these islamofascistic scumbags did with the boxcutters.

My point is that much of the security measures after 9/11 was in fact security theater.

If passengers and crews on the 9/11 planes had known about the attacker's intentions they would not have been able to acquire their real weapons, the planes.

The extortion wouldn't have worked.

Yes, people would have been threatened, injured and killed but it wouldn't have been different from Sudden Jihad Syndrome on the ground, awful, but not something TSA style security could prevent.

IIRC some passengers on United 93 armed themselves with *butter knives* in their desperate attempt to wrest control of the plane from the attackers. Focusing on weapons instead of people is the wrong approach.
Posted by: Javiper Whavimble3831   2011-03-02 18:15  

#4  Anybody see anything about who Peraltalajara is beyond what has been said here?
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-03-02 17:21  

#3  They used boxcutters to murder people, Javiper, and terrorise the rest into submission. Blackmail is the wrong word.
Posted by: Grunter   2011-03-02 17:16  

#2  I'm not even convinced boxcutters should be banned on flights, especially after 9/11.

The 9/11 attackers used the boxcutters to blackmail the crew into giving them control of the plane, which then became the real terror weapon.

After 9/11 it is clear that giving in to such blackmail would mean certain death for all people on the plane and countless others on the ground. A terrorist threatening a hostage's life with a boxcutter would not have any leverage.

If the terrorists want to attack and kill innocents with knives or blades they can do so on the ground, without being bothered by security checks.
Posted by: Javiper Whavimble3831   2011-03-02 16:49  

#1  Oh... I feel soooo much safer.

Can we just defund and get rid of the TSA already? The only things they do is waste money and piss people off.
Posted by: DarthVader   2011-03-02 14:59  

00:00