You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
XM-25 Gets Even More Rave Reviews
2011-02-14
The XM-25 performed flawlessly and has our soldiers asking for more. The XM-25, Counter Defilade Target Engagement System with 25mm rounds, is semi-automatic, and includes fully integrated day/night, full-solution target acquisition/fire control. Soldiers in the field have given it the nickname "The Punisher."

"Since its first contact Dec. 3, the XM25 has been in nine engagements with two units at different locations, officials said. Specifically, it has disrupted two insurgent attacks on observation posts, taken out two PKM machine gun positions and destroyed four ambush sites.

In one engagement, an enemy machine gunner was "so badly wounded or so freaking scared that he dropped [his] weapon" and ran, said Lt. Col. Christopher Lehner, Program Manager Individual WeaponsThere were no casualties among units carrying the XM25 in those nine engagements, Lehner said.

"No longer can the enemy shoot at American forces, then hide behind something," said Brig. Gen. Peter Fuller of Program Executive Office Soldier. "This is a revolutionary weapon. This is a game-changer."

The XM25 has a target acquisition system that calculates range with the push of a button. The data is transferred to an electronic fuse, enabling the 25mm round to explode over the target and rain shell fragments on the enemy.

All five prototypes were sent to Afghanistan in November. Officials are putting the final touches on data and analysis, but said Col. Douglas Tamilio, project manager for soldier weapons, said the weapons "performed flawlessly" and no maintenance issues showed.

Soldiers have been so pleased with the XM25 that they are carrying it as a primary weapon, and not bothering to bring an M4 as a secondary weapon, said Maj. Christopher Conley, who monitored the employment of XM25 on behalf of PEO Soldier.

Lehner said the tests revealed only one problem: The units didn't want to give the Punisher back."
With 100m of MER over an AK-47, I can see how this would just be a mother in the offense. As backup, I think I'd go for an automatic shotgun, like a AA-12, so if the XM-25 goes south, nobody is going to advance on me without getting shredded.
Posted by: Anonymoose

#9  No disrespect Gentlemen, but let's get under the bleachers AFTER the game, shall we?
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-02-14 23:36  

#8  On second thought: I may start a company to buy XM-8's and market them to the military. I figure if I rebadge them as "M-16A8"s I may be able to pull it off.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-02-14 18:37  

#7  If they could build in an over/under barrel that would fire 5.56NATO then you'd have the best of both worlds.

It originally was part of a combined-weapons sytem called the XM-29, which got split into the XM-25 and the XM-8, which was a lot better than the M-4/M-16 for about the same price, but runs into the barrier that You Can't Ever Admit There's Anything Wrong With The Various M-16 Rifles...

You can type in "XM-29" and "XM-8" into the search engine of your choice to see what they looked like.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-02-14 18:34  

#6  I take it the Talib are getting an object lesson in Concealment versus Cover, and finding that neither may matter anymore against US forces armed with this thing.

Just curious if this is supposed to be a squad weapon like an LMG (SAW or M60 type), or an individual like a grenade launcher.

If they could build in an over/under barrel that would fire 5.56NATO then you'd have the best of both worlds.

The only concern I have, now that it apparently does will in real filed conditions, is ammo weight and capacity. How much does a grunt need, versus how much can he carry.
Posted by: OldSpook   2011-02-14 18:25  

#5  Moose speaks the truth. I was in the very front of the sweep of VII Corps wiht 2ACR. The logistics guys kept up with us even though we were hauling ass and had sprinted out 40Km in front of the Corps main elements. Gassed up and plenty of ammo is a nice way to be when your regiment has to chew through and open a breach in the side of 2 Guards mech/armored divisions.
Posted by: OldSpook   2011-02-14 18:21  

#4  said the weapons "performed flawlessly" and no maintenance issues showed

use of the XM25 declared a war crime by the usual suspects in 5..4..3..
Posted by: nGuard   2011-02-14 18:21  

#3  I always get a hoot out of the exoskeleton idea, because its best application is not combat, but rear area. Such a tool would be invaluable in doing what could be the work of a hundred men, things like loading trucks. Without a healthy percentage of them injured in the process.

Norman Schwartzkopf was only able to pull off his hail Mary movement on the Saudi border because of a Herculean movement of supplies through hundreds of miles of desert, and by air. It is logistical movements like that, that determine the outcome of modern wars.

A machine that could speed that up many times would be worth its weight in gold.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-02-14 17:50  

#2  Needs to be integrated into a exoskeleton!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7351314.stm


Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-02-14 17:04  

#1  
Posted by: gorb   2011-02-14 16:20  

00:00